Abstract:Based on publications indexed in the Web of Science, the current study focused on internationally collaborated publications and publications acknowledging government funding of developing and developed countries including China, the US, Germany, the Netherlands, South Africa, and Brazil. Specific focus is placed on national funding agencies (i.e., focal agencies) supporting competitive research in science. The focal agencies of the six countries include the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC), the US National Science Foundation (NSF), German Research Foundation, the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO), National Research Foundation of South Africa (NRF), and National Council for Scientific and Technological Development of Brazil (CNPq). Results show that different countries vary in arrangement of government funding sources in support of competitive research projects. China and Brazil are centralized to the NSFC and CNPq, whereas the remaining four countries have relatively decentralized sources. The six focal national funding agencies of the current study are more efficient than non-focal agencies in raising citation impact, with the NWO, NSF, and NSFC perform better than non-focal agencies of corresponding countries. International collaboration improves citation impact, with the developing countries benefit more. Authorship (first or corresponding authorship) also plays a role in international collaboration. Collaboration led by authors from developed countries has a positive effect whereas that led by authors from developing countries usually have negative effects on citation impact. Interaction between funding and collaboration may have results different from those when these two factors are considered separately, which suggests being cautious while discussing effects of either of the two factors.

Analysis of the "Matthew Effect" and its Change in the Distribution of National Natural Science Fund

Funding allocation, inequality, and scientific research output: an empirical study based on the life science sector of Natural Science Foundation of China

Analysis on the Relationship Between Original Innovations and Science Funds

Investigating Academic Graph‐Based Factors Behind Funding Success in National Institutes of Health

Analysis of projects funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China during the years of 2014–2018

Comparative Study on Output Performance of Major Public Funds in Terms of Chinese-language Publications

The Analysis and Research on the Evaluation Index System of the Natural Science Foundation of China

The Matthew Effect in China's Science: Evidence from Academicians of Chinese Academy of Sciences.

Analysis of major programs in the field of health science funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China between the years 2010 and 2018

Theoretical Analysis & Research Demonstration of China's Higher Education Financial Input in the Future Ten Years

Research on the Long-Term Impact of Science Foundation on Academic Output

Public funding and the ascent of Chinese science: Evidence from the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Analysis of China's Top-ten Progress of Science in 2016: Development of Science and Technology Promoted by NSFC

The Matthew effect in China's science

Analysis of population health projects funded by Joint Fund of the National Natural Science Foundation of China between 2015 and 2019

Analysis of the Funded Projects of Management Science Based on the 2006-2015 NSFC Project Data

International Comparison on Structural Transformation of R&D Funds Source and Chinese Choice of Transformation

An In-Depth Analysis of Government Funding and International Collaboration in Scientific Research

Comparative study on structural transformation of R&D funds in PR China and USA

Analysis of the proposals in the field of pathogenic microorganism and infection submitted and fund-ed by National Natural Science Foundation of China in 2014