The Logic Foundation of the Paradigm of Institutional Research—the Differentiation of Research Object and the Thought of Analysis

Fuqiang Zhu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1674-2486.2011.04.003

2011-01-01

Abstract:It is needed to define the connotation and extensionof institution in order to establish an effective research paradigm of institution.Currently,there are three main understanding on institute based on game theory:game players,game rules and game's equilibrium,and the latter two is essential.Among them,we can distinguish institute from two dimensions:one is make a division between formal and informal institute,because they have big difference in the trajectory of origin and the principle of formation;the other is make a division between personal habits and social customs,because they have big difference in the scope of impact and the nature of "should be".Clearly,new institutionalism are keen to take the institute as a self-sustaining balance of the game produced by an individual interaction by using game theory tools.But largely,it only research the formation of personal habits,but not the analysis of institute.Therefore,we must maintain a cautious attitude on the equilibrium analysis based on mainstream game theory framework,and actively introduced historical and social factors into the analytical framework of deduction.