Abstract:The debate on the methodology of constitutional jurisprudence has become much hotter than ever for recent years. The dilemma how the constitutional theories should react to the political realities yields the significant controversy between the political constitutionalism and the normative constitutionalism, which is grounded on the dichotomy of fact and norm. However, either political constitutionalism or normative constitutionalism is insupportable in context of methodology. The political constitutionalism is near to the sociology of law, both of which try to reflect the positive law through inquiring into the social or political realities. However, they seem to be lost in the chains of causation, take the factual interests and purposes as the standards of evaluation and tend to ignore the normativity and legitimacy. Thus it overemphasizes the importance of the unwritten constitution, the policies and the interests at the price of the authority and stability of the constitution. The normative constitutionalism sets its foundation on the positive constitution while has not so much ideas of the sources of its legitimacy and validity. Neither offers it an answer to the question of the philosophical foundation of the constitution as a value—related law. This also affects the concretizing and interpretation of the constitution. As a science of "understanding", the constitutional jurisprudence is neither a pure and strictly logical theory of values nor a pure positive theory or sociology of fact description. The values in the constitution derive from the integration of facts and norms and the integration of the constitutional norms and the realities, and reflect the spirits of our times. To integrate the normative meaning of the constitution and the ever changing realities through the integrative constitutional interpretation is the main issue for modern constitutional jurisprudence.

Is Monarch a Good Thing? A Critique of "Confucian Constitutionalism"

Multiple reflections on the monarch-subject relationship of Confucianism during the Ming and Qing Dynasties

Historical Observation and Study on the Thought of Constitutional Monarchy in the Late Qing Dynasty

On Constitutional Politics

Responses to Those who Advocate the Constitutional Theory of China to be Replaced by the Japanese Ones

Understanding,Critique and Constitution

A Debate on the Probability of Constitutional Government in Modem China

Heaven: the Possibility and Basis of Being a Monarch--Dong Zhongshu's Philosophical Interpretations of Being a Monarch

How Do Chinese Judges Invoke the Constitution? Analysis Based on 1907 Decisions

Moral Confucianism or Political Confucianism? Old Mission of A New State or New Mission of An Old State: Some Reflections on the Revival of Confucianism

THE RELATION BETWEEN CONFUCIANISM AND CHINESE POLITICS: HISTORY, ACTUALITY, AND FUTURE

Reflections on the Century- Old Constitutional Government in China

On Zhang Jian's Political Thoughts and Practice Before the 1911 Revolution

Reflection on the Methodology of Chinese Constitutional Jurisprudence

Heaven,Kingship and the Royal Power: Fundamental Structure of Kingship Politics and its Function to Rectify Civilization

A Reflection on the History of Chinese Constitutionalism of Last Century

Focus:Constitution Legislation at Late Qing Dynasty and Rethinking of China's Route toward Constitutionalism The Losses in "Traditional" Chinese Constitutionalism Development

Study On the Localization of The Constitutional Review in China—With Reference to The United States

On Chen Duxiu's Constitutional Government Thoughts

From "the Executive-led" to "Limited Government"

Theoretical Discussion and Reconsideration on the Dual Structure of the Land Ownership in China from the Perspective of Constitutionalism