Abstract:There are three models on the structure of Chinese governance ,all taking account of the central government ’ s objectives about governance efficiency and political stability at the same time .They are the“administrative subcontract system” model by Zhou Li‐An ,the model of“centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” by Cao Zhenghan ,and the“empire’ s governance logic” model by Zhou Xueguang . All three models have significant divergences in terms of whether the two objectives of efficiency and stability of the central government can be compatible or not .Zhou Li‐An and Cao Zhenghan argue that the two objectives are compatible in specific governance structure ,which is not shared by Zhou Xueguang who argues that the co‐existence of centralization and decentralization cannot lead to a stable structure and the two processes are subject to cyclical adjustment and cyclic fluctuation .And also , the analyses of the three models focus on different levels . The “administrative subcontract system”model and the“empire’ s governance logic” model mainly discuss the governance structure and mechanism of the different levels of governments within the bureaucratic system , while the model of “centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” focuses on how the way of central government dealing with the public shapes the basic structure of decentralization . The divergences are caused by two reasons . First , these three models hold different assumptions about whether the rule over the military and the people can be separated . Second ,there exists the disagreement about which one is the critical source of political risks between decentralization itself (e .g . the local governments’ behaviors as deviation ,out of control ,etc .) and the public (e .g .the public’s behaviors as protest ,opposition ,confrontation ,etc .) .

Heaven,Kingship and the Royal Power: Fundamental Structure of Kingship Politics and its Function to Rectify Civilization

Political Risks and Decentralization:The Comparison of Three Models on Chinese Governance

Centralization and Decentralization of Power Structure:A Theory of Ruling Risks and Empirical Evidence from Chinese History

Structure Hypothesis of Authoritarian Rule: Evidence from the Lifespans of China's Dynasties

Political Risk of Centralization and the Vertical Separation of Powers:Reform of Contemporary Social Management System from a Historical Perspective

Between the Kingly Way and the Way of Might:An Inquiry into Jia Yi's Political Philosophy

The Politics Morality Foundation and the Power of Reign

THE RELATION BETWEEN CONFUCIANISM AND CHINESE POLITICS: HISTORY, ACTUALITY, AND FUTURE

Confucianism on Political Legitimacy

Just Hierarchy between Citizens

Politics Thought and Enlightened Autocracy of Mencius

John Milton'S Idea Of Kingship And Its Comparison With Confucianism

A Government of the People and by the Meritocrats:the Mixed Regime Structure of Confucianism and Its Advantages

On the Pre-Qin Confucian Views of the Rulers and Subjects

Against Political Equality

Is Monarch a Good Thing? A Critique of "Confucian Constitutionalism"

On Order of Power and Power Constraints

Hegemonic Authority and Domestic Legitimation: Japan and Korea under Chinese Hegemonic Order in Early Modern East Asia

To Reiterate Sovereignty of People: Reform on the Structure of National Power

Just Hierarchy between States ON THE NEED FOR RECIPROCITY

An Analysis of the Confucian Idea of People as Roots:Means or Ends