Abstract:There are three models on the structure of Chinese governance ,all taking account of the central government ’ s objectives about governance efficiency and political stability at the same time .They are the“administrative subcontract system” model by Zhou Li‐An ,the model of“centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” by Cao Zhenghan ,and the“empire’ s governance logic” model by Zhou Xueguang . All three models have significant divergences in terms of whether the two objectives of efficiency and stability of the central government can be compatible or not .Zhou Li‐An and Cao Zhenghan argue that the two objectives are compatible in specific governance structure ,which is not shared by Zhou Xueguang who argues that the co‐existence of centralization and decentralization cannot lead to a stable structure and the two processes are subject to cyclical adjustment and cyclic fluctuation .And also , the analyses of the three models focus on different levels . The “administrative subcontract system”model and the“empire’ s governance logic” model mainly discuss the governance structure and mechanism of the different levels of governments within the bureaucratic system , while the model of “centralized personal controls at the national level , and decentralized ruling over the people regionally” focuses on how the way of central government dealing with the public shapes the basic structure of decentralization . The divergences are caused by two reasons . First , these three models hold different assumptions about whether the rule over the military and the people can be separated . Second ,there exists the disagreement about which one is the critical source of political risks between decentralization itself (e .g . the local governments’ behaviors as deviation ,out of control ,etc .) and the public (e .g .the public’s behaviors as protest ,opposition ,confrontation ,etc .) .

A Government of the People and by the Meritocrats:the Mixed Regime Structure of Confucianism and Its Advantages

The Superiority of the Confucian Hybrid Regime Defended

Can Pragmatic Confucian Democracy Justify Electoral Representative Government?

Against Political Equality

Political Risks and Decentralization:The Comparison of Three Models on Chinese Governance

Just Hierarchy between Citizens

Democracy and Meritocracy: A False Dichotomy

The Introversive Political Meritocracy: A Political Possibility Beyond “the End of History”

Confucianism on Political Legitimacy

The Influence of Mencius’ Humanism and Benevolent Government on Contemporary Society

An Analysis of the Confucian Idea of People as Roots:Means or Ends

A Confucian Theory of Rights

Improving the Effectiveness of National Governance by Meritocracy

Politics Thought and Enlightened Autocracy of Mencius

Heaven,Kingship and the Royal Power: Fundamental Structure of Kingship Politics and its Function to Rectify Civilization

An Economic Analysis of the Comment of "Pedantic,Unrealistic and Unhelpful in Solving Problems" on Mencius' Thought of "Benevolent Governing"

Toward a Consultative Rule of Law Regime in China

A Debate on the Probability of Constitutional Government in Modem China

The Return of the Ideal of Benevolent Government to Cosmopolitanism——The Confucian Political Philosophy and the Rebalance of the International Order

Marketization, Class Structure, and Democracy in China: Contrasting Regional Experiences

The Minben Meritocratic State’s Impact on Contemporary Political Culture