Abstract:International Relations scholars have turned to China’s tributary system to broaden our understanding of international systems beyond the ‘states-under-anarchy’ model derived from European history. This scholarship forms the inspiration and foil for this article, which refines International Relations scholars’ conceptualizations of how international hierarchy arose and endured in East Asia during the Manchu Qing Dynasty — China’s last and most territorially expansive imperial dynasty. I argue that existing conceptions of East Asian hierarchy overstate the importance of mutual identification between the region’s Confucian monarchies in sustaining Chinese hegemony. Instead, we can understand Qing China’s dominance only once we recognize the Manchus as a ‘barbarian’ dynasty, which faced unique challenges legitimating its rule domestically and internationally. As ‘barbarian’ conquerors, Manchus did not secure their rule by simply conforming to pre-existing Sinic cultural norms. Instead, like other contemporary Eurasian empires, they maintained dominance through strategies of heterogeneous contracting. Domestically, they developed customized legitimacy scripts tailored to win the allegiance of the empire’s diverse communities. Internationally, meanwhile, the Manchus strategically appropriated existing Confucian norms and practices of tributary diplomacy in ways that mitigated — but did not eliminate — Confucian vassals’ resentment of ‘barbarian’ domination. East Asian hierarchy may have been more peaceful than Westphalian anarchy, but the absence of war masks a more coercive reality where the appearance of Confucian conformity obscured more fractious relations between Qing China and even its ostensibly most loyal vassals.

The Superiority of the Confucian Hybrid Regime Defended

A Government of the People and by the Meritocrats:the Mixed Regime Structure of Confucianism and Its Advantages

Against Political Equality

Can Pragmatic Confucian Democracy Justify Electoral Representative Government?

A Confucian Theory of Rights

Confucianism on Political Legitimacy

Communitarian Interpretation of Confucianism and Just Hierarchy

Just Hierarchy between Citizens

Descriptive Or Normative, Political Or Ethical? - Some Reflections On The Challenges Of The Pandemic

Response: Confucianism to Correct the Excesses of Democracy and Nation-State - Tongdong Bai, Against Political Equality: The Confucian Case. (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2020. Pp. 344.)

Toward a Consultative Rule of Law Regime in China

The Introversive Political Meritocracy: A Political Possibility Beyond “the End of History”

Democracy and Meritocracy: A False Dichotomy

Is Monarch a Good Thing? A Critique of "Confucian Constitutionalism"

Against the Rule of Man: the Confucian and Western Traditions of Good Administration

Reviving the Past for the Future?: the (in)compatibility Between Confucianism and Democracy in Contemporary China

Moral Confucianism or Political Confucianism? Old Mission of A New State or New Mission of An Old State: Some Reflections on the Revival of Confucianism

A response to Francis Fukuyama’s ‘reflections on Chinese governance’

A Confucian Improvement of Democracy

Contesting the Confucian peace: Civilization, barbarism and international hierarchy in East Asia

An Analysis of the Confucian Idea of People as Roots:Means or Ends