Early and mid-term results after 17 mm St.Jude Medical Regent mechanicalvalve replacement in patients with small aortic valve ring

LIU Yi,SUN Zongquan,DONG Nianguo,DU Xinling,JIANG Xionggang,HU Lin
DOI: https://doi.org/10.13201/j.issn.1001-1439.2013.05.023
2013-01-01
Journal of Clinical Cardiology
Abstract:Objective:To observe outcomes of patients with small aortic valve ring after St.Jude Medical(SMJ)Regent mechanical valve replacement and to investigate the feasibility of small size prosthesis. Method:Eighteen patients received implantation of 17 mm SMJ Regent aortic prostheses(case group) and 18 patients received 21 mm St.Jude aortic prostheses(control group).All the patients followed up by 12 months. Result:Compared with pre-operation,patients in the two groups showed significant improvements in the left ventricular end-diastolic diameter,left ventricular posterior wall thickness,aortic pressure gradient and left ventricular ejection fraction(all P<0.05).However,there was no statistical difference between the two groups. Conclusion:For underweight patients and those with small body surface area,17 mm SJM Regent valve prosthesis may produce good therapeutic effect,and some parameters are even close to those after implantation of 21 mm SJM Regent valve prosthesis.No obvious prosthesis-patient mismatch occurs after the placement of the 17 mm valve prosthesis and aortic valve ring expansion is not necessary.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?