Effect Of J-valve For Treatment Of Native Aortic Regurgitation (NAV) On Left Ventricular (LV) Ejection Fraction (EF) And LV Geometry. A Single Center Compassionate Use Study
Hanad Bashir,Cassady Palmer,Christian Schmidt,Santiago Garcia,Dean J. Kereiakes,Eugene Chung
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.10.036
IF: 6.592
2024-01-01
Journal of Cardiac Failure
Abstract:Introduction Severe aortic regurgitation (AR) is the indication for 20-30% of surgical aortic valve replacements and is associated with increased morbidity and mortality. No transcatheter device has received U.S. approval for the treatment of AR. J-valve is a short frame, self-expanding TAVR device specifically designed for treatment of severe AR (Figure 1A). LV pressure overload can result in alterations of LV geometry. The four resulting categories are: normal, concentric hypertrophy (CH), eccentric hypertrophy (EH), and concentric remodeling (CR). Baseline geometry, and LVEF after J-valve placement for native valve AR, may be helpful in further understanding the heart's response to sudden and minimally invasive removal of severe pre- and afterload, and provide prognostic information. Methods From 2019 through 2023 patients with symptomatic severe AR who were not surgical candidates or excluded from the ALIGN-AR trial were enrolled into a compassionate use early feasibility study at five North American centers. Here, we report the echocardiographic (echo) changes with LVEF and LV geometry of our 15 patients treated at a single center (The Christ Hospital, Cincinnati, OH). LV geometry was categorized as normal (normal RWT (relative wall thickness), normal LV mass (LVM)), CH (increased RWT, increased LVM), EH (normal RWT, increased LVM), or CR (increased RWT, normal LVM). Results Data from 15 patients (mean age 75.1 years; 46.7% male) with symptomatic AR (93% NYHA class III/IV, all with grade 3 or 4 AR) show mean pre-procedural LVEF 41.9 ± 17.1. Post-procedural AR was none/trivial in all patients, and 14/15 survived to 30 days. Follow-up echocardiograms at 30 days revealed improvement of mean LVEF 45.6 ± 14.6 (p-value 0.039); 1 year echo for 5/6 patients revealed LVEF 52.6 ± 14.9 (p-value 0.043). As the majority of our patients have not reached the 1-year mark. LV geometry preprocedural 36% CH; 36% EC; and 29% normal. 1 month follow-up, 23% CH; 8% CR; 23% EH; and 46% normal. 1 year follow-up 20% CH; 20% ER; and 60% normal (Figure 1B). Conclusion Following J-valve placement for symptomatic, severe AR, LV geometry and ejection fraction revert toward normal in a large proportion of patients.
cardiac & cardiovascular systems