Abstract:Objective: To examine the early outcome of valve sparing aortic root replacement with reimplantation technique (David procedure) with partial upper sternotomy. Methods: From April 2016 to April 2020, 31 patients underwent valve sparing aortic root replacement under partial upper sternotomy at Vascular Surgery Center, Fuwai Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College. There were 28 males and 3 females, aging (44±13) years (range: 11 to 65 years). Preoperative aortic regurgitation was found greater than moderate in 15 patients, moderate in 6 patients and less than moderate in 10 patients. The diameter of aortic annulus was (26±3) mm (range: 21 to 34 mm), the diameter of aortic sinus was (51±6) mm (range: 41 to 68 mm), the diameter of ascending aorta was (43±8) mm (range: 26 to 62 mm). The preoperative ejection fraction was (65±4) % (range: 59% to 72%) and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was (55±6) mm (range: 42 to 68 mm). All cases were treated with David Ⅰ procedure, including simple David procedure in 26 patients, David+ascending aorta and partial aortic arch replacement in 3 patients, David+thoracic endovascular aortic repair in 1 patient, David+stent elephant trunk implantation in 1 patient. Results: The operation time, cardiopulmonary bypass time and aortic cross-clamping time were (330±58) minutes (range: 214 to 481 minutes), (138±23) minutes (range: 106 to 192 minutes) and (108±17) minutes (range: 82 to 154 minutes), respectively. There were no death and serious complications (stroke, myocardial infarction, renal insufficiency, severe infection, etc.). The postoperative drainage volume within 24 hours was (314±145) ml (range: 130 to 830 ml). The intubation time was (14±3) hours (range: 8 to 21 hours), and the ICU time was (M(QR)) 2.1(1.5) days (range: 1.0 to 5.0 days). Eight patients had no blood transfusion, the proportion of red blood cell use was 9.7% (3/31), plasma use was 22.6% (7/31), and platelet use was 71.0% (22/31). The postoperative left ventricular ejection fraction was (62±4)% (range: 54% to 69%), and left ventricular end-diastolic diameter was (48±4) mm (range: 39 to 56 mm). After operation, aortic regurgitation was significantly improved, with no more than moderate regurgitation, small to moderate regurgitation in 3 patients, minor regurgitation in 3 patients, micro regurgitation in 12 patients and no regurgitation in 13 patients. The follow-up period was 3.5(6.1) months (range: 2.0 to 39.0 months). Echocardiographic follow-up data were obtained in 26 cases, including moderate regurgitation in 1 patient, small to moderate regurgitation in 9 patients, minor regurgitation in 5 patients, micro regurgitation in 6 patients and no regurgitation in 5 patients. There were no major adverse cardiovascular events and aortic events during the follow-up period. No patient was reoperated for aortic regurgitation. Conclusion: Valve sparing aortic root replacement under partial upper sternotomy is safe and feasible, and the early result is satisfactory.

Replacement of the st jude medical regent valve in the aortic position with a continuous suture technique in the small aortic root.

Intermittent stuck valve after aortic valve replacement with a mechanical valve: A case report.

Application of Regent Mechanical Valve in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus: 3-Year Follow-Up.

[Early and Mid-Term Results after 17 Mm St Jude Regent Mechanical Valve Replacement in 44 Patients with Small Aortic Root].

Early and mid-term results after 17 mm St.Jude Medical Regent mechanicalvalve replacement in patients with small aortic valve ring

Transapical aortic valve implantation using J-Valve? system for high-risk patients with aortic regurgitation: mid-stage of 1 year follow-up

Clinical application of minimally invasive aortic valve replacement through right parasternal longitudinal small incision for patients with aortic valve disease

[Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement for Isolated Aortic Valve Disease: Clinical Analysis of 101 Consecutive Patients].

Comparative study between parasternal sternum minimally invasive incision and conventional median sternotomy incision in simple aortic valve replacement

Long-term outcomes of mini-sternotomy versus conventional sternotomy for aortic valve replacement: a randomized controlled trial

Minimally Invasive and Full Sternotomy Aortic Valve Replacements Lead to Comparable Long-Term Outcomes in Elderly Higher-Risk Patients: A Propensity-Matched Comparison

Continuous or interrupted pledgeted suture technique in stented bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement: a comparison of in-hospital outcomes

Application of simple interrupted suturing combined with hemodynamic plus valve in aortic valve replacement in small aortic annulus

Transapical Transcatheter Valve Replacement Using J-Valve for Aortic Valve Diseases

[Early outcome of valve sparing aortic root replacement with partial upper sternotomy]

Up to Thirty-Year Survival after Aortic Valve Replacement in the Small Aortic Root

The Northern New England Rapid Deployment Valve Experience: Survival and Procedural Outcomes From 2015 to 2021

Short-Term Outcomes after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Predominant Aortic Regurgitation with Left Ventricular Dysfunction.

Valve-sparing and Valve-Replacing Techniques for Aortic Root Replacement in Patients with Marfan Syndrome: Analysis of Early Outcome

Sutureless Aortic Valve Replacement vs. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation in Patients with Small Aortic Annulus: Clinical and Hemodynamic Outcomes from a Multi-Institutional Study

Long-term Results of Valve-Sparing Aortic Root Replacement in Acute Type A Aortic Dissection