Comparative Study of Two Kinds of CAD Softwares for Volumetric Measurement of Lung Nodules--a Phantom Study

李敏,龚建平,张伟,钱铭辉
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1000-0313.2013.01.007
2013-01-01
Abstract:Objective:To evaluate the accuracy and the consistency of CT phantom nodule volumetry measurement with pulmonary CT intellective CAD software and Lung VCAR sotware.Methods:Spherical nodules 2.5mm,5.0mm,10.0mm and 20.0mm in diameter were placed within a commercially available lung phantom and scanned by a 64-slice CT scanner.Nodule volume(V) was measured by the formula V=(4/3)πr3.Automated nodule volume measurements were performed by using the two above-mentioned CAD softwares independently.Results:The volume of all 16 nodules within the phantom could be measured and analyzed by the two softwares.The average relative errors of nodules 2.5mm,5.0mm,10.0mm and 20mm in diameter were 21.1%,-4.7%,-1.6% and-2.3% respectively with pulmonary CT intellective CAD software.The average relative errors of nodules 2.5mm,5.0mm,10.0mm and 20.0mm in diameter were 15.5%,3.1%,2.7% and 1.4% respectively with Lung VCAR software.There was no substantial difference in the volume estimations between the two CAD softwares by Bland Altman analysis.Conclusion:Although the accuracy of volumetry measurement with pulmonary CT intellective CAD software was lower than that of lung VCAR,but still there was high consistency between the two CAD softwares.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?