Absolute ground truth-based validation of computer-aided nodule detection and volumetry in low-dose CT imaging

Louise D'hondt,Pieter-Jan Kellens,Kwinten Torfs,Hilde Bosmans,Klaus Bacher,Annemiek Snoeckx
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.103344
IF: 3.119
2024-04-11
Physica Medica
Abstract:Highlights • This study uses an objective nodule ground truth for the CAD performance validation. • Volumetry and densitometry tools of the CAD software are extensively validated. • Nodule diameter is the decisive factor for detection sensitivity and volume accuracy. • CAD software shows robustness for variation in CT acquisition parameters in a phantom. Purpose To validate the performance of computer-aided detection (CAD) and volumetry software using an anthropomorphic phantom with a ground truth (GT) set of 3D-printed nodules. Methods The Kyoto Kaguku Lungman phantom, containing 3D-printed solid nodules including six diameters (4 to 9 mm) and three morphologies (smooth, lobulated, spiculated), was scanned at varying CTDI vol levels (6.04, 1.54 and 0.20 mGy). Combinations of reconstruction algorithms (iterative and deep learning image reconstruction) and kernels (soft and hard) were applied. Detection, volumetry and density results recorded by a commercially available AI-based algorithm (AVIEW LCS + ) were compared to the absolute GT, which was determined through μCT scanning at 50 μm resolution. The associations between image acquisition parameters or nodule characteristics and accuracy of nodule detection and characterization were analyzed with chi square tests and multiple linear regression. Results High levels of detection sensitivity and precision (minimal 83 % and 91 % respectively) were observed across all acquisitions. Neither reconstruction algorithm nor radiation dose showed significant associations with detection. Nodule diameter however showed a highly significant association with detection (p 6 mm were accurate within 10 % absolute range from volume GT , regardless of dose and reconstruction. Nodule diameter and morphology are major determinants of volumetric accuracy (p < 0.001). Density assignment was not significantly influenced by any parameters. Conclusions Our study confirms the software's accurate performance in nodule volumetry, detection and density characterization with robustness for variations in CT imaging protocols. This study suggests the incorporation of similar phantom setups in quality assurance of CAD tools.
radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging
What problem does this paper attempt to address?