Abstract:Purpose Intravoxel incoherent motion is a diffusion-weighted imaging magnetic resonance imaging technique that measures microvascular perfusion from a multi-b value sequence. Intravoxel incoherent motion microvascular perfusion has not been directly compared to conventional dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion-weighted imaging in the context of acute ischemic stroke. We determined the degree of correlation between perfusion-weighted imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion parameter maps in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Methods We performed a retrospective cohort study of acute ischemic stroke patients undergoing thrombectomy treatment triage by magnetic resonance imaging. Intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion fraction maps were derived using two-step voxel-by-voxel post-processing. Ischemic core, penumbra, non-ischemia, and contralateral hemisphere were delineated based upon diffusion-weighted imaging and perfusion-weighted imaging using a Tmax >6 s threshold. Signal intensity within different brain compartments were measured on intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM f, IVIM D*, IVIM fD*) parametric maps and compared the differences using one-way ANOVA. Ischemic volumes were measured on perfusion-weighted imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion parametric maps. Bland–Altman analysis and voxel-based volumetric comparison were used to determine the agreements among ischemic volumes of perfusion-weighted imaging and intravoxel incoherent motion perfusion parameters. Inter-rater reliability on intravoxel incoherent motion maps was also assessed. Significance level was set at α < 0.05. Results Twenty patients (11 males, 55%; mean age 67.1 ± 13.8 years) were included. Vessel occlusions involved the internal carotid artery (6 patients, 30%) and M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery (14, 70%). Mean pre-treatment core infarct volume was 19.07 ± 23.56 ml. Mean pre-treatment ischemic volumes on perfusion-weighted imaging were 10.90 ± 13.33 ml (CBV), 24.83 ± 23.08 ml (CBF), 58.87 ± 37.85 ml (MTT), and 47.53 ± 26.78 ml (Tmax). Mean pre-treatment ischemic volumes on corresponding IVIM parameters were 23.20 ± 25.63 ml (IVIM f), 14.01 ± 16.81 ml (IVIM D*), and 27.41 ± 40.01 ml (IVIM fD*). IVIM f, D, and fD* demonstrated significant differences ( P < 0.001). The best agreement in term of ischemic volumes and voxel-based overlap was between IVIM fD* and CBF with mean volume difference of 0.5 ml and mean dice similarity coefficient (DSC) of 0.630 ± 0.136. Conclusion There are moderate differences in brain perfusion assessment between intravoxel incoherent motion and perfusion-weighted imaging parametric maps, and IVIM fD* and perfusion-weighted imaging CBF show excellent agreement. Intravoxel incoherent motion is promising for cerebral perfusion assessment in acute ischemic stroke patients.

Computed Tomography Perfusion Software Pipelines to Assess Parameter Maps and Ischemic Volumes: A Comparative Study.

Assessment of Perfusion Volumes by a New Automated Software for Computed Tomography Perfusion

Defining Core and Penumbra in Ischemic Stroke: A Voxel- and Volume-Based Analysis of Whole Brain CT Perfusion.

Comparison of 3 CT Perfusion Software Packages in Estimation of Ischemic Lesions in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients

[Thresholds of CT Perfusion in Predicting Ischemic Penumbra and Infarct Core in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke].

Agreement of Three CT Perfusion Software Packages in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison with RAPID.

Comparison of three commonly used CT perfusion software packages in patients with acute ischemic stroke

CT Permeability Imaging Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients Treated with Intra-arterial Thrombolytic Therapy

Baseline Cerebral Ischemic Core Quantified by Different Automatic Software and Its Predictive Value for Clinical Outcome

Accuracy of Four Different CT Perfusion Thresholds for Ischemic Core Volume and Location Estimation Using IntelliSpace Portal

Predictive Value of Different Computed Tomography Perfusion Software Regarding 90-Day Outcome of Acute Ischemic Stroke Patients After Endovascular Treatment: A Comparison With Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Computed Tomography Workup Of Patients Suspected Of Acute Ischemic Stroke Perfusion Computed Tomography Adds Value Compared With Clinical Evaluation, Noncontrast Computed Tomography, And Computed Tomography Angiogram In Terms Of Predicting Outcome

A Comparison of CT Perfusion Output of Rapid.AI and Viz.ai software in the Evaluation of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Comparison of two automated CT perfusion software packages in patients with ischemic stroke presenting within 24 h of onset

Computed Tomography Workup of Patients Suspected of Acute Ischemic Stroke

Noncontrast Computed Tomography e-Stroke Infarct Volume Is Similar to RAPID Computed Tomography Perfusion in Estimating Postreperfusion Infarct Volumes

Potential Approach to Quantifying the Volume of the Ischemic Core in Truncated Computed Tomography Perfusion Scans: A Preliminary Study.

Abstract WMP18: CT Work-Up of Patients Suspected of Acute Ischemic Stroke: Perfusion-CT Adds Value Compared to Clinical Evaluation, Noncontrast Head CT and CT-Angiogram in Terms of Predicting Outcome

Comparison of MRI IVIM and MR Perfusion Imaging in Acute Ischemic Stroke Due to Large Vessel Occlusion

Comparison of CT perfusion summary maps to early diffusion-weighted images in suspected acute middle cerebral artery stroke

Using Standard First-Pass Perfusion Computed Tomographic Data to Evaluate Collateral Flow in Acute Ischemic Stroke