Agreement of Three CT Perfusion Software Packages in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Comparison with RAPID.

Qingqing Lu,Junyan Fu,Kun Lv,Yan Han,Yuning Pan,Yiren Xu,Jun Zhang,Daoying Geng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110500
IF: 4.531
2022-01-01
European Journal of Radiology
Abstract:Purpose: To compare ischemic core volume (ICV) and penumbra volume (PV) measured by MIStar, F-STROKE, and Syngo.via with that measured by RAPID in acute ischemic stroke (AIS), and their concordance in selecting patients for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT).Methods: Computed tomography perfusion (CTP) data were processed with four software packages. Bland-Alt-man analysis and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were performed to evaluate their agreement in quan-tifying ICV and PV. Kappa test was conducted to assess consistency in the selection of EVT candidates. The correlation between predicted ICV and segmented final infarct volume (FIV) on follow-up images was investigated.Results: A total of 91 patients were retrospectively included. F-STROKE had the best consistency with RAPID (ICV: ICC = 0.97; PV: ICC = 0.84) and Syngo.via had the worst consistency (ICV: ICC = 0.77; PV: ICC = 0.66). F-STROKE had the narrowest limits of agreements both in ICV (-27.02, 24.40 mL) and PV (-85.59, 101.80 mL). When selecting EVT candidates, MIStar (kappa = 0.71-0.88) and F-STROKE (kappa = 0.84-0.90) had good to excellent consistency with RAPID, while Syngo.via had poor consistency (kappa = 0.20-0.41). ICV predicted by MIStar was correlated strongest with FIV (r = 0.77).Conclusions: F-STROKE is most consistent with RAPID in quantitative ICV and PV. F-STROKE and MIStar exhibit similar EVT candidate selection to RAPID. Syngo.via, for its part, seems to have overestimated ICV and under-estimated PV, leading to an overly restrictive selection of EVT candidates.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?