Abstract:Objective To evaluate the improvement on test performance of UniCel DxH 800 automated hematology analyzer for complete blood count (CBC) by detecting its performance indicators and comparing the differences of the results with LH 750 hematology analyzer and ADVIA 2120 hematology analyzer.Methods The precision,carryover and linearity of UniCel DxH 800 in measurement of CBC were evaluated by using fresh blood samples and instrument quality control of products.To evaluate the accuracy of leukocyte differential count and reticulocyte count with the microscopic method as the “gold standard”.To calculate the bias and correlation between the results measured by LH 750,ADVIA 2120 and UniCel DxH 800 hematology analyzers and compare these three instruments on the validity of the alarm in abnormal cells.Results Intra-precision:The coefficient of variation (CV) of the results of RBC,Hb and MCV were less than 0.5％,the CV of WBC and PLT results were less than 1.5％.Inter-precision:the CV of the parameters above were less than 2.5％.The carryover rate of WBC,RBC,Hb,MCV and PLT were less than 0.51％.In the concentration range covered by clinical samples,the correlation coefficients between the measured values and theoretical value in testing WBC,RBC,Hb and PLT were greater than 0.999 ( P ＜0.01 ).The measurement results of WBC,RBC,Hb,MCV and PLT hy UniCel DxH 800,ADV1A 2120 and LH 750 hematology analyzers have good correlation (r ＞ 0.973,P ＜ 0.01 ).Correlation of reticulocyte count between the UniCel DxH 800 hematology analyzer and microscolpic method was significant (r =0.920,P ＜0.01 ).Correlation of leukocyte differential count about the grauulocytes, lymphocytes and eosinophils between the UniCel DxH 800 hematology analyzer and microscopic method was good (r =0.914,0.900 and 0.725,P ＜0.01 ),followed by monocytes ( r =0.612,P ＜0.01 ),which were better than the LH 750 with similar detection principle.The UniCel DxH 800 hematology analyzer demonstrated higher sensitivity (96.6％ ) for the alarm of abnormal cells and achieved a lower false-negative rate (2.5％ ).Meanwhile,the sensitivity of the neutrophil nuclei left shift was higher (90.5％ ) and the false-negative rate (5.0％) was lower.Conclusions The UniCel DxH 800 hematology analyzer for complete blood count shows advantages of high precision,low carryover rate and wide linear range.The results detected by the UniCel DxH 800 hematology analyzer have good correlation with the LH 750 and ADVIA 2120.

Performance evaluation of Bayer ADVIA 2120 automated hematology analyzer

Performance Evaluation of the Sysmex CS-5100 Automated Coagulation Analyzer.

Evaluation for Clinical Application of UniCel DxH 800 Hematology Analyzer

Performance Evaluation of Mindray BC 5800 Automatic Hematology Analyzer

An Evaluation of the Sysmex NE-8000® Hematology Analyzer

Performance evaluation the new automated Atellica Hema 580 hematology analyzer

An evaluation of the CELL-DYN 1700 haematology analyser: automated cell counting and three-part leucocyte differentiation

Performance evaluation of the new hematology analyzer UniCel DxH 900

[Establishment and Evaluation of Review Criteria for ADVIA 120/2120 and Different Series of Hematology Analyzers].

Evaluation of haematology analyzer CELL-DYN 3700 SL

Performance characteristics of automated clinical chemistry analyzers using commercial assay reagents contributing to quality assurance and clinical decision in a hospital laboratory

Performance evaluation of the automated nucleated red blood cell count of five commercial hematological analyzers

Performance evaluation of WBC and RBC counting with the Beckman-Coulter Z2 cell counter

Performance evaluation of routine blood and C-reactive protein analysis using Mindray BC-7500 CRP auto hematology analyzer

Detection of nucleated red blood cells using the Mindray BC-6800Plus hematology analyzer: a clinical performance evaluation

Performance Evaluation of Clinical Detection of Coagulation Factors, Protein S, Protein C, Anti-thrombin Ⅲ, and von Willebrand Factor Antigen

Evaluation and cell warning information for clinical application of five-part differential hematology analyzer

Performance of automated digital cell imaging analyzer Sysmex DI-60

Comparison of five automated hematology analyzers in a university hospital setting: Abbott Cell-Dyn Sapphire, Beckman Coulter DxH 800, Siemens Advia 2120i, Sysmex XE-5000, and Sysmex XN-2000

Performance Evaluation of Fully Automated 5-Part Differential Hematology Analyzer ELite 580 (ERBA)

Reliability analysis of indication abnormality of the mindray BC-5500 auto hemtology analyzer