Abstract:Recently, V. Laure van Bambeke used an original approach to solve the famous problem of transformation of values into production prices by considering that capital reallocation to each department (branch) was part of the problem. Here, we confirm the validity of this consideration in relation with the satisfaction of demand (social need which is able to pay for the given product). In contrast to V. Laure van Bambeke's method of solving an overdetermined system of equations (implying that compliance with Marx's fundamental equalities could only be approached), we show that the transformation problem is solvable from a determined (two-branch models) or an underdetermined system of equations enabling to obtain exact solutions through an algorithm we provide, with no approximation needed. For systems with three branches or more, the solution of the transformation problem belongs to an infinite ensemble, accounting for the observed high competition-driven market fluidity. Furthermore, we show that the transformation problem is solvable in the absence of fixed capital, supporting that dealing with the latter is not essential and cannot be seen as a potential flaw of the approach. Our algorithm enables simulations illustrating how the transient rise in the rate of profit predicted by the Okishio theorem is consistent with the tendency of the rate of profit to fall (TRPF) subsequent to capital reallocation, and how the TRPF is governed by the increase of organic composition, in value. We establish that the long-standing transformation problem is not such a problem since it is easily solved through our algorithm, whatever the number of branches considered. This emphasizes the high coherence of Marx's conception, and its impressive relevance regarding issues such as the TRPF, which have remained intensely debated.

The crux of the methodology of the so-called "transformation problem"

Enlightenment Reason and Modernity: Marx’s Critical Reconstruction

The Markov Process Is Misleading in Solving the Transformation Problem:A Review of Michio Morishima's Solution

Marx's "Value Transfonnation" and Sraffa' s "Standard System

The Transformation Problem of Values into Prices of Production: Marx Errors or an Inattentive Reading of 'Capital'?

Marx's Original Intention in Transformation Problem and Questions from Interpretation

The Philosophical Method of Marx's Economic Assumptions as Exemplified in the Relationship between Two Definitions of "Socially Necessary Labor Time"

On the Century-Old Mathematical Proof of Marxist Transformation Theory and a Rational Insight into Economic Phenomena——Pushing Forward Economic Studies on the Basis of Interpreting Marxist Propositions

Marx's "Value Transformation" and Sraffa's "Standard System"

From Text to Theory——Some Basic Problems of Studies on Marx and Engels' Texts

The Transformation from Value Determination to Value Realization: the Logical Dilemma of the Okishio Theorem

The Essentiality of Marx's Conversion on the Problem of Alienation——Debates between Zhang Kuiliang and Yu wujin

The Homonological Value of Marx's Alienated Labor Theory

From Marx's fundamental equalities to the solving of the transformation problem -- Coherence of the model

The Ineffective Innovation of Chinese Mathematical Solution in Marx Value Conversion Problem

Exploring Marx’s Labor Theory of Value from the Experience of Common Sense Chinese Full Text

Marx and the Transition Problem

Is Marx's Theory of Alienated Labor in Paris Manuscript Circular Reasoning

Some Problems in Furthering Studies of Theory on Value of Labor

A Real Economic Topic versus A Scholarly Negation with False Evidence——Review 'Value Transformation: A False Problem' by Mr. Feng Jinhua

Three Problems in Studies of Marx's Philosophy——Answer to Prof.Duan Zhongqiao