Abstract:Recently, V. Laure van Bambeke used an original approach to solve the famous problem of transformation of values into production prices by considering that capital reallocation to each department (branch) was part of the problem. Here, we confirm the validity of this consideration in relation with the satisfaction of demand (social need which is able to pay for the given product). In contrast to V. Laure van Bambeke's method of solving an overdetermined system of equations (implying that compliance with Marx's fundamental equalities could only be approached), we show that the transformation problem is solvable from a determined (two-branch models) or an underdetermined system of equations enabling to obtain exact solutions through an algorithm we provide, with no approximation needed. For systems with three branches or more, the solution of the transformation problem belongs to an infinite ensemble, accounting for the observed high competition-driven market fluidity. Furthermore, we show that the transformation problem is solvable in the absence of fixed capital, supporting that dealing with the latter is not essential and cannot be seen as a potential flaw of the approach. Our algorithm enables simulations illustrating how the transient rise in the rate of profit predicted by the Okishio theorem is consistent with the tendency of the rate of profit to fall (TRPF) subsequent to capital reallocation, and how the TRPF is governed by the increase of organic composition, in value. We establish that the long-standing transformation problem is not such a problem since it is easily solved through our algorithm, whatever the number of branches considered. This emphasizes the high coherence of Marx's conception, and its impressive relevance regarding issues such as the TRPF, which have remained intensely debated.

The Markov Process Is Misleading in Solving the Transformation Problem:A Review of Michio Morishima's Solution

Marx's "Value Transformation" and Sraffa's "Standard System"

From Marx's fundamental equalities to the solving of the transformation problem -- Coherence of the model

Marx's "Value Transfonnation" and Sraffa' s "Standard System

The Transformation from Value Determination to Value Realization: the Logical Dilemma of the Okishio Theorem

The Transformation Problem of Values into Prices of Production: Marx Errors or an Inattentive Reading of 'Capital'?

A Real Economic Topic versus A Scholarly Negation with False Evidence——Review 'Value Transformation: A False Problem' by Mr. Feng Jinhua

The Method Innovation of Systematic Analysis Model in Technical Economics Research

Money and Totality: A Macro-Monetary Interpretation of Marx’s Logic in Capital and the End of the “Transformation Problem”

Exploring Marx’s Labor Theory of Value from the Experience of Common Sense Chinese Full Text

Factor Distortion,Misallocation and Productivity

Misreading Marx's concepts of Production by J.Baudrillard

The Philosophical Absurdity of the Turn of the Theory of Price in the Western Mainstream Economics ——An Observation Based on K. Marx’s Theory of Labor Value

The Distortion of the Labor Market,the Difference in its Efficiency,and the Income Disparity between Peasants and Town People

Marx'S Labor Theory of Value and Its Implications for Structural Problems in China'S Economy

Materialized and Humanized Forms of Labor Value——Paradox of Output Value and Its Solution

Production Structure, Income Distribution and Macroeconomic Efficiency: an Analysis Framework and Empirical Study of the Marxist Political Economy

Marxist transition theory and its contemporary value——Reconsideration from the general perspective of political economics

The Philosophical Method of Marx's Economic Assumptions as Exemplified in the Relationship between Two Definitions of "Socially Necessary Labor Time"

Comments on Japanese "Early Marx" Controversy:The Significances of Glossen zu James Mill on the Reconstruction of Marx’s Alienation Theory

Markov Chains and Kinetic Theory: A Possible Application to Socio-Economic Problems