Abstract:Recently, V. Laure van Bambeke used an original approach to solve the famous problem of transformation of values into production prices by considering that capital reallocation to each department (branch) was part of the problem. Here, we confirm the validity of this consideration in relation with the satisfaction of demand (social need which is able to pay for the given product). In contrast to V. Laure van Bambeke's method of solving an overdetermined system of equations (implying that compliance with Marx's fundamental equalities could only be approached), we show that the transformation problem is solvable from a determined (two-branch models) or an underdetermined system of equations enabling to obtain exact solutions through an algorithm we provide, with no approximation needed. For systems with three branches or more, the solution of the transformation problem belongs to an infinite ensemble, accounting for the observed high competition-driven market fluidity. Furthermore, we show that the transformation problem is solvable in the absence of fixed capital, supporting that dealing with the latter is not essential and cannot be seen as a potential flaw of the approach. Our algorithm enables simulations illustrating how the transient rise in the rate of profit predicted by the Okishio theorem is consistent with the tendency of the rate of profit to fall (TRPF) subsequent to capital reallocation, and how the TRPF is governed by the increase of organic composition, in value. We establish that the long-standing transformation problem is not such a problem since it is easily solved through our algorithm, whatever the number of branches considered. This emphasizes the high coherence of Marx's conception, and its impressive relevance regarding issues such as the TRPF, which have remained intensely debated.

A Real Economic Topic versus A Scholarly Negation with False Evidence——Review 'Value Transformation: A False Problem' by Mr. Feng Jinhua

The Transformation Problem of Values into Prices of Production: Marx Errors or an Inattentive Reading of 'Capital'?

Marx's "Value Transfonnation" and Sraffa' s "Standard System

The Transformation from Value Determination to Value Realization: the Logical Dilemma of the Okishio Theorem

Marx's "Value Transformation" and Sraffa's "Standard System"

The Markov Process Is Misleading in Solving the Transformation Problem:A Review of Michio Morishima's Solution

Economic analysis of global value Chain from different angles

What is Credible Key of Deflation-Growth Puzzle in China?

On Capital Productivity——With Consideration to a Kind of Viewpoint

A Discussion on Price Difference Hypothesis of Factor about Circular Economy

The Philosophical Absurdity of the Turn of the Theory of Price in the Western Mainstream Economics ——An Observation Based on K. Marx’s Theory of Labor Value

The Value and Assessment of Agricultural Resource Environment

WHY ECONOMICS CONCERNS THE THEORY OF VALUE

From Marx's fundamental equalities to the solving of the transformation problem -- Coherence of the model

Transformation of the Theory of Value as a Necessity for the Formation of the Newest Paradigm of Economic Theory

Cost Distortions and Structural Imbalances in China

Fan Li's Thoughts on Prices: A Preliminary Inquiry

Knowledge is Money: Do People Think Cultural Capital Can Be Transformed into Economic Value?

Analysis on the Low Efficient Allocation of Environmental Resources and the Facts That the Advantaged Groups Capture the Natural Capital

A new interpretation of the objectivist concept of value in the context of the theory of material reproduction

Money and Totality: A Macro-Monetary Interpretation of Marx’s Logic in Capital and the End of the “Transformation Problem”