What is Credible Key of Deflation-Growth Puzzle in China?

FANG Hong-sheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16011/j.cnki.jjwt.2009.11.007
2009-01-01
Abstract:Through the comprehensive and deeper analysis of two different types of hypothesis ,we think that compared to excess production capacity hypothesis,demand-deficiency hypothesis is more credible. Main reasons are as follows:(1)Based on current estimation techniques,we don’t find that there is breakpoint evidence on potential production growth rate before deflation took place,so excess production capacity hypothesis has been falsified and demand-deficiency hypothesis verified;(2) Excess production capacity hypothesis doesn’t distinguish between credit tightening and credit crunch and hides time concept on deflation occurance. In fact,according to the analysis of demand-deficiency hypothesis,there is indeed sufficient reasons to support both credit tightening and credit crunch’s existence before deflation took place. Besides,it has obvious deficiency in proving excess capacity;(3) On indentifying the mechanisms on deflation-growth puzzle,demand-deficiency hypothesis focus on time concept and integrates facts with explanation,but excess production capacity hypothesis doesn’t do it and has serious identifying problem. Besides,we think,Based-FTPL hypothesis supported by logic inference based on facts and formal empirical evidences may improve demand-deficiency hypothesis from policy-mix perspective.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?