Papilla Alteration in Different Gingival Biotypes at Single Implant-Supported Restoration in Anterior Maxilla

Chung-hao Chou,Jia-ji Mo,Mi-si Si,Ying-xin Gu,Juan Du,Zhi-yong Zhang,Hong-chang Lai
2012-01-01
Abstract:PURPOSE:To observe the alteration of the interproximal papilla height after single implant restoration in the anterior maxilla and to assess the influence of gingival biotypes on papilla regeneration.METHODS:Thirty patients with single-tooth implant-supported restorations in the anterior maxilla were assigned to two groups according to labial mucosa thickness. Group A: labial mucosal thickness≥1.5 mm and group B: labial mucosal thickness<1.5 mm. The presence of interproximal papilla as well as the distance between papilla apex and contact point were assessed at crown attachment (baseline) and after 6 months (follow-up).Statistical analysis was performed using SPSS19.0 software package.RESULTS:The 6-month survival rate of implants was 100%. The mean height of interproximal papilla at baseline and follow-up was (1.64±0.97) mm and (3.10±1.39) mm, respectively. A significant improvement in papilla height was found between baseline and follow-up(P<0.05). In group A, the mean distance from papilla apex to the contact point at mesial and distal aspects was (0.15±0.24) mm and (0.23±0.33) mm, respectively, and the presence of interproximal papilla were (97±5)% and (94±8)%, respectively. In group B, the mean distance from papilla apex to the contact point at mesial and distal aspects was (1.94±0.40) mm and (2.10±0.34) mm, respectively, and the presence of interproximal papilla was (53±9)% and (43±14)% respectively. Statistically significant difference was found between the two groups(P<0.05).CONCLUSIONS:The interproximal papilla height around single implant restorations could improve significantly after 6-month follow-up. The interproximal papilla height around single-tooth implants in the anterior maxilla was influenced by gingival biotype. The regenerative potential of thick-gingival biotype was better than that of thin-gingival biotype.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?