Abstract:BackgroundTraditionally, dental implants have been made from titanium or titanium alloys. Alternatively, zirconia-based ceramic implants have been developed with similar characteristics of functional strength and osseointegration. Ceramic implants offer advantages in certain settings, e.g. in patients who object to metal dental implants. The aim of this study was to investigate the mid-term (36 months) clinical performance of a ceramic monotype implant in single-tooth edentulous area.MethodsThis was a prospective, open-label, single-arm study in patients requiring implant rehabilitation in single-tooth edentulous area. Ceramic implants (PURE Ceramic Implant, Institut Straumann AG, Basel, Switzerland) with a diameter of 4.1 mm were placed following standard procedure and loaded with provisional and final prostheses after 3 and 6 months, respectively. Implant survival rate and implant success rate were evaluated and crestal bone levels were measured by analysing standardized radiographs during implant surgery and at 6, 12, 24 and 36 months.ResultsForty-four patients received a study implant, of whom one patient withdrew consent after 3 months. With one implant lost during the first 6 months after surgery, the implant survival rate was 97.7% at 6 months. No further implants were lost over the following 30 months, and 3 patients were lost to follow-up during this time frame. This led to a survival rate of 97.5% at 36 months.Six months after implant surgery 93.0% of the implants were considered “successful”, increasing to 97.6% at 12 months and remaining at this level at 24 months (95.1%) and 36 months (97.5%).Bone loss was most pronounced in the first half-year after implant surgery (0.88 ± 0.86 mm). By contrast, between 12 and 36 months the mean bone level remained stable (minimal gain of 0.06 [± 0.60] mm). Hence, the overall bone loss from implant surgery to 36 months was 0.97 (± 0.88) mm.ConclusionsIn the follow-up period ceramic implants can achieve favourable clinical outcomes on a par with titanium implants. For instance, these implants can be recommended for patients who object to metal dental implants. However, longer term studies with different edentulous morphology need to confirm the present data.Trial registrationRegistered on www.clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02163395.

Papilla‐Crown Height Dimensions around Zirconium Dioxide Implants in the Esthetic Area: A 3‐Year Follow‐Up Study

Peri-implant Marginal Bone Changes with Implant-Supported Metal-Ceramic or Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns: A Retrospective Clinical Study of 1 to 5 Years.

Papilla and alveolar crest levels in immediate versus delayed single-tooth zirconia implants

Dimensions of hard and soft tissue around adjacent, compared with single-tooth, zirconia implants

The Two-Dimensional Size of Peri-Implant Soft Tissue in the Anterior Maxilla and Some Relevance: A 1- to 7-Year Cross-Sectional Study.

Peri-implant Crestal Bone Changes Around Zirconia Implants in Periodontally Healthy and Compromised Patients.

A prospective clinical study to evaluate the performance of zirconium dioxide dental implants in single-tooth edentulous area: 3-year follow-up

Esthetic outcome and alterations of soft tissue around single implant crowns: a 2-year prospective study.

[Effect of zirconia personalized gingival penetration on peri-implant soft and hard tissue of thin gingival biotypes in the anterior region: a retrospective study]

Papillae Alterations Around Single-Implant Restorations in the Anterior Maxillae: Thick Versus Thin Mucosa.

Papilla Alteration in Different Gingival Biotypes at Single Implant-Supported Restoration in Anterior Maxilla

Prospective controlled clinical study investigating long‐term clinical parameters, patient satisfaction, and microbial contamination of zirconia implants

Evaluation of the Papilla Level Surrounding Single-tooth Implants Crowns in the Esthetic Zone

Retrospective, Multi-center, Cohort Study Evaluating Clinical, Technical, Biological, and Esthetic Outcomes of Implant Supported Zirconia Single Crowns Cemented on Titanium-base Abutments: 7-year Mean Follow-up

[Effect of Customized Zirconia Abutment on Peri-Implant Tissue: a One-Year Prospective Study].

Clinical performance of monolithic zirconia crowns on titanium-zirconium reduced-diameter implants in the molar area: Interim data at three years of a randomized controlled trial

Prospective Clinical Multicenter Study Evaluating the 5-Year Performance of Zirconia Implants in Single-Tooth Gaps

Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Zirconia Dental Implants—A Clinical Case Series Study

Experimental custom-made zirconia abutments for narrow implants in esthetically demanding regions: a 5-year follow-up

Peri-implant and esthetic outcomes of cemented and screw-retained crowns using zirconia abutments in single implant-supported restorations-A systematic review and meta-analysis

Clinical performance of implant crowns with customized zirconia abutments: A prospective cohort study with a 4.5- to 8.8-year follow-up