Abstract:Study Design. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) was translated and then adapted and validated. Objective. Translation of the RMDQ into simplified Chinese characters (SCRMDQ), and its cross-cultural adaptation and validation in patients with low back pain with or without radicular leg pain. Summary of Background Data. The RMDQ is used worldwide and versions in traditional Chinese characters are available in Hong Kong and Taiwan. But there is no version in simplified Chinese characters for use in Mainland China. Methods. The original version of the RMDQ was translated and back-translated, and then cross-cultural adaptation of the simplified Chinese version was performed following published guidelines. The SCRMDQ was validated in 150 patients, 30 of whom finished the prefinal SCRMDQ and helped determine the final version. The remaining 120 patients were asked to complete the final SCRMDQ, simplified Chinese Oswestry Disability Index (SCODI), and visual analogue scale. Reliability was assessed with the final version using internal consistency by the Cronbach alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient; structural validity was evaluated by correspondence analysis. Then comparison of SCRMDQ and SCODI was performed. Results. A total of 116 patients in the final validation study finished the questionnaires completely. Their mean age was 52.17 +/- 11.95 years (range, 22-78 yr) and the mean low back pain duration was 42.04 +/- 60.94 months (range, 2-480 mo). The average time taken was 4.11 +/- 1.48 minutes (range, 2-9 min) on SCRMDQ and 7.37 +/- 3.98 minutes (range, 3-30 min) on SCODI. The mean SCRMDQ, SCODI, and visual analogue scale scores were 14.07 +/- 4.79 (range, 2-24), 23.98 +/- 10.38 (range, 2-47), and 57.17 +/- 20.72 (range, 0-95), respectively. In the final test, the Cronbach a for internal consistency was 0.826 and intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.947; both showed adequate acceptance. Positive and statistically significant correlations were found between SCRMDQ and SCODI (r = 0.791, P < 0.01) and visual analogue scale (r = 0.493, P < 0.01), indicating sufficient structural validation. Most patients preferred SCRMDQ to SCODI, because it was simpler to understand and easier to finish. Conclusion. The SCRMDQ was reliable and valid as a low back pain measurement tool in patients with or without radicular leg pain in Mainland China. The further use and research with the questionnaire were recommended.

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of World Health Organization Quality of Life-Disability Scales for physical disability

Reliability and validity of World Health Organization-disability attitudes scales in Chinese version

[Reliability and Validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese Version Used in an Elderly Population of Zhejiang Province in China].

Preliminary Validation Study of the WHO Quality of Life (WHOQOL) Scales for People with Spinal Cord Injury in Mainland China.

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

The Chinese version of the world health organization quality of life instrument-older adults module (WHOQOL-OLD): psychometric evaluation

Validation of the EQ-5D in a general population sample in urban China

Construct validity of the Chinese version of WHOQOL-BREF & Disabilities module in 1000 adults with disabilities: An Item Response Theory analysis

Psychometric properties of the WHO Quality of Life questionnaire (WHOQOL-100) in patients with chronic diseases and their caregivers in China.

The Role of Quality of Care and Attitude Towards Disability in the Relationship Between Severity of Disability and Quality of Life: Findings from a Cross-Sectional Survey among People with Physical Disability in China

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36--item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses

Measurement properties of the Chinese version of the Youth Quality of Life Instrument-Weight Module (YQOL-W).

[Reliability and Validity of a Chinese Version of the Quality of Life in Epilepsy Inventory (QOLIE-31-P)].

Development and Evaluation of the Quality of Life Scale for Children With Visual Impairments in China

Validity and Reliability Testing of the Chinese (mainland) Version of the 39-Item Parkinson’s Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39)

Reliability and Validity for Chinese Version of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory PedsQL4.0

Reliability and Validity of Chinese Version of Impact on Participation and Autonomy Questionnaire for Discharged Patients with Spinal Cord Injury

The World Health Organization Quality of Life instrument for people with intellectual and physical disabilities (WHOQOL-Dis): evidence of validity of the Brazilian version

Validation Study of the Chinese Version of the Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised for Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury in Mainland China.

Reliability and validity for Chinese Version of Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory PedsQLTM3.0 Cardiac Module