Abstract:Study Design. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ) was translated and then adapted and validated. Objective. Translation of the RMDQ into simplified Chinese characters (SCRMDQ), and its cross-cultural adaptation and validation in patients with low back pain with or without radicular leg pain. Summary of Background Data. The RMDQ is used worldwide and versions in traditional Chinese characters are available in Hong Kong and Taiwan. But there is no version in simplified Chinese characters for use in Mainland China. Methods. The original version of the RMDQ was translated and back-translated, and then cross-cultural adaptation of the simplified Chinese version was performed following published guidelines. The SCRMDQ was validated in 150 patients, 30 of whom finished the prefinal SCRMDQ and helped determine the final version. The remaining 120 patients were asked to complete the final SCRMDQ, simplified Chinese Oswestry Disability Index (SCODI), and visual analogue scale. Reliability was assessed with the final version using internal consistency by the Cronbach alpha coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient; structural validity was evaluated by correspondence analysis. Then comparison of SCRMDQ and SCODI was performed. Results. A total of 116 patients in the final validation study finished the questionnaires completely. Their mean age was 52.17 +/- 11.95 years (range, 22-78 yr) and the mean low back pain duration was 42.04 +/- 60.94 months (range, 2-480 mo). The average time taken was 4.11 +/- 1.48 minutes (range, 2-9 min) on SCRMDQ and 7.37 +/- 3.98 minutes (range, 3-30 min) on SCODI. The mean SCRMDQ, SCODI, and visual analogue scale scores were 14.07 +/- 4.79 (range, 2-24), 23.98 +/- 10.38 (range, 2-47), and 57.17 +/- 20.72 (range, 0-95), respectively. In the final test, the Cronbach a for internal consistency was 0.826 and intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.947; both showed adequate acceptance. Positive and statistically significant correlations were found between SCRMDQ and SCODI (r = 0.791, P < 0.01) and visual analogue scale (r = 0.493, P < 0.01), indicating sufficient structural validation. Most patients preferred SCRMDQ to SCODI, because it was simpler to understand and easier to finish. Conclusion. The SCRMDQ was reliable and valid as a low back pain measurement tool in patients with or without radicular leg pain in Mainland China. The further use and research with the questionnaire were recommended.

Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36--item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses

Reliability and validity of World Health Organization-disability attitudes scales in Chinese version

Measuring Disability and Its Predicting Factors in a Large Database in Taiwan Using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0

[Reliability and Validity of a Short-Form Health Survey Scale (SF-36), Chinese Version Used in an Elderly Population of Zhejiang Province in China].

Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of World Health Organization Quality of Life-Disability Scales for physical disability

Development and Psychometric Tests of a Chinese Version of the SF-36 Health Survey Scales.

Reliability and Validity of the 12-Item WHODAS 2.0 in Patients with Kashin–Beck Disease

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire.

Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Oswestry Disability Index

Validation of the Chinese version of the Oswestry Disability Index

Reliability and Validity of an Instrument to Assess Pediatric Inpatients' Experience of Care in China.

Construct validity and reliability of the Chinese version of the Disaster Preparedness Evaluation Tool in Taiwan

Validation of a Disability Assessment Tool Based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health in the Chinese Context

Clinical validity of the 12-item WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with psychotic disorders

Cross-cultural adaptation of Cantonese (Hong Kong) Oswestry Disability Index version 2.1b

Measuring Disability Across Cultures — the Psychometric Properties of the WHODAS II in Older People from Seven Low‐ and Middle‐income Countries. the 10/66 Dementia Research Group Population‐based Survey

Psychometric properties of the Child and Adolescent Scale of Participation – Traditional Chinese version

Influence of visual impairment and hearing impairment on functional dependence status among people in Taiwan-An evaluation using the WHODAS 2.0 score

Development the short version of elderly disability assessment scale

The Sexual Satisfaction Scale for Women (SSS-W): Adaptation and Validation of a Traditional Chinese Version in Taiwan

Proxy Reliability of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II among Adult Patients with Mental Disorders