Comparison of Percutaneous Nephrostomy and Mini-Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Calculus Pyonephrosis

冯辉,刘建河,李绍棠,王峰业,宋松,倪亮亮
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-6450.2011.09.011
2011-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the methods,effects and advantages of percutaneous nephrostomy(PCNL) and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy(mPCNL) in the treatment of calculus pyonephrosis.Methods A retrospective analysis about clinical data of 18 patients with calculus pyonephrosis treated with standard percutaneous nephrolithotomy channel gravel and 22 patients treated with minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy stone lithotripsy.Data were collected from June 2006 to May 2010.Evaluated the treatment,clinical efficacy and its benefits and other information of these data.Results There was complete removal of stones in both groups,no significant difference was found in clearance rate of stone between the two groups(81.3%vs 89.0%,P0.05),renal function was normal after operation,no serious complications were occurred. Conclusion There was no significant difference in the stone free rate between the two methods.Both PCNL and mPCNL are safe and effective for the treatment of calculus pyonephrosis.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?