Effect Comparison between Open Surgery and Minimally Invasive Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) for Treatment of Patients with Kidney Stone

Hu QU,Zhong-yang WANG,Bo MA,Hao-feng YUAN,Jing ZHANG
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15912/j.cnki.gocm.2014.19.202
2014-01-01
Abstract:Objective To analyze and evaluate the clinical effect and reference value of open surgery and MPCNL for treatment of kidney stone. Method 128 patients with kidney stone were chosen and divided into minimally-invasive group and open group. Hospital stays, operation time, bleeding amount during operation, stone clearance rate and complications of the 2 groups were observed and compared. Result Hospital stays, operation time, bleeding amount during operation, and complication rate of minimally-invasive group were all less than open group, and one-time stone clearance rate of minimally-invasive group was higher than open group(P<0.05). Conclusion MPCNL for treatment of kidney stone has advantages of high one-time stone clearance rate, short hospital stays and complication occurrence rate. So it is worth of being popularized and applied clinically.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?