Abstract:Background Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is a common operative procedure and many options regarding the type of the selected graft and fixation technique have been described to date. Although many studies have addressed the issue of the optimal femoral fixation device during ACLR with a hamstring tendon (HT) autograft, no clear evidence to indicate one technique over another has been found. Objective The purpose of this study was to compare the long-term postoperative outcomes and complication rates between transfemoral Cross-pin (CP) and Endobutton-Cortical Button (CB) fixation techniques in patients undergoing ACLR with an HT autograft. Methods One hundred and seven consecutive patients underwent ACLR by using a quadruple HT autograft that was stabilized with either a CP (CP Group: 52 patients) or a CB (CB Group: 55 patients) fixation technique. The Lachman test (LT), the Pivot-shift test (PST), the side-to-side difference in anterior translation of the tibia, the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and the Lysholm knee scoring systems were evaluated before surgery and during long-term follow up. The femoral and tibial tunnel diameter was measured in the anteroposterior (AP) and lateral radiographs after surgery and at the final follow-up. A review of the literature was also carried out to identify any differences between both techniques. Results Study groups were comparable in terms of patient demographics. The mean follow-up was 10.4 ± 1.3 and 10.6 ± 1.3 years in the CP and CB Groups, respectively (p = 0.47). In the CP Group, improvements after surgery in LT and PST from grade 2 (n=34) or 3 (n=18) to grade 0 (n = 41) or 1 (n = 11) and from grade 2 (n=36) or 3 (n = 16) to grade 0 (n = 44) or 1 (n = 8), respectively, were observed. In the CB Group, similar improvements in LT and PST scores from grade 2 (n = 40) or 3 (n = 15) to grade 0 (n = 46) or 1 (n = 9) and from grade 2 (n = 41) or 3 (n = 14) to grade 0 (n = 47) or 1 (n = 8), respectively, were observed. However, no differences between the groups (p = 0.53 for LT and p = 0.90 for PST) were noted. The mean Lysholm scores were 89.7 ± 6.8 and 90.2 ± 7.2 in the CP and CB groups, respectively (p = 0.59). Side-to-side difference improved from 9.1 ± 2.8 to 1.7 ± 1.5 mm and from 8.6 ± 2.5 to 1.6 ± 1.4 mm in the CP and CB groups, respectively (p = 0.89 between groups). According to IKDC grades, 92.1% and 91.4% of knees in the CP and CB groups, respectively were reported to be Grade A (Normal) or B (Nearly Normal) with a p = 0.7. Femoral and tibial tunnel widening was found in the last follow-up in both groups. However, there was no difference in the degree of tunnel widening among the two techniques. With respect to LT, PST, anterior drawer test, and IKDC score, none of the 15 published comparative studies demonstrated any significant differences between the two techniques and only one study detected a difference regarding the Lysholm score in favor of CP fixation. Conclusion In the long term, both CB and CP femoral stabilization techniques were shown to be associated with similar functional outcomes and low complication rates. Further large multicenter random clinical trials are still required to identify the most effective method of femoral fixation for HT autograft during ACLR surgery.

The Clinical Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Anterior Tibial Muscle Tendons Allograft and Hamstring Tendon Autograft

A Retrospective Study of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Patella Tendon:Allograft Versus Autograft

[A Prospective Clinical Study on Autologous Periosteum Wrapping Tendon Allograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction].

A Comparative Study on Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Between Allograft and Autograft

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft

PROSPECTIVE STUDY ON ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION WITH PRESERVING REMNANT ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT BY ALLOGRAFT LIGAMENT

Autograft Versus Allograft Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial Investigating Quadriceps Versus Hamstring Tendon Autograft in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Is Peroneus Longus Allograft Good Alternative for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: a Comparison Study

Clinical outcomes of transtibial versus anteromedial drilling techniques to prepare the femoral tunnel during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Bone-patellar tendon-bone graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: allograft versus autograft

A prospective randomized controlled study of hamstring and bone-free quadriceps tendons autografts in arthroscopic ACL reconstruction

Comparison of Arthroscopic Single-tunnel Double-bundle and Single-tunnel Single-bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions

Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament with the Tibial Remnant Tendon and Gracilis Tendon Autograft

[Anterior crucial ligament reconstruction with allograft hamstring fixed by Rigidfix and Intrafix anchorages]

Clinical Evaluation of Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedure Using Hamstring Tendon Grafts: a Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Study.

Preliminary Clinical Research of Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using a Patella Tendon Allograft

Comparison Between Single- and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with 6-to 8-Stranded Hamstring Autograft: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

Long-Term Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Either Synthetics with Remnant Preservation or Hamstring Autografts: A 10-Year Longitudinal Study

Comparison of Cross-Pin Versus Cortical Button Femoral Fixation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction With Hamstrings Autograft: A Long-Term Clinical Study and Review of the Literature

MRI STUDY ON TENDON REGENERATION AFTER ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION WITH HAMSTRING TENDON AUTOGRAFTS