A Comparative Study on Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone Between Allograft and Autograft

江东,余家阔,敖英芳,于长隆,王健全,崔国庆,胡跃林,田得祥,龚熹,王永健,程序
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0253-2352.2008.11.003
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare clinical results of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone(B-PT-B) between allograft and autograft.Methods Twentyseven patients underwent ACL reconstruction using irradiated deep-frozen B-PT-B allograft,including 18 males and 9 females,with an average age of 25.5 years(range,16-49 years).Twenty-five patients underwent the same operation but using autograft B-PT-B,including 19 males and 6 females,with an average age of 26.7 years (range,18-43 years).The same arthroscopie technique was used to perform the reconstruction.Postoperative temperature,erythrocyte sedimentation rate,C reactive protein examined.During follow-up,parameters included International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) scores,Tegner scores,Lysholm scores,anterior knee pain and KT-2000 side-to-side difference.Muscle strength were measured by the Biodex dynamometer.Results The average follow-up was 37.1 (range,30-48) months in the allograft group and 36.3 (range,30-54) months in the autograft group.No significant difference was found for IKDC scores (89.5/86.5),Lysholm scores (93.0/94.6),Tegner scores (8.0/7.7),anterior knee pain (44.4%/72.0%)and side-to-side difference[30°: (1.72±1.73) mm vs (1.16±1.32) mm; 90°:(1.37±1.90) nun vs (-0.08±1.62)mm].Quadriceps muscle strength recovered to 82.7%/82.8% (60°/s and 120°/s) and 86.6%/85.3% (60°/sand 120°/s) for the allograft and autograft group with no significant difference.Conclusion There was no significant difference with stability and muscle strength recovery between B-PT-B aUograft and autograft.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?