Bone-patellar tendon-bone graft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: allograft versus autograft

李卫平,宋斌,黄建荣,沈慧勇,杨睿,宋洋
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3321/j.issn:0253-2352.2008.11.004
2008-01-01
Abstract:Objective To compare the clinical curative effect between autograft and allograft bone patella tendon-bone (B-PT-B) transplant to reconstruct anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) arthroseopically.Methods ACL reconstruction using autograft and allograft B-PT-B were performed in 66 patients in the study,autograft group had 31 cases,allograft group had 35 cases; observe the biochemistry,immunology and the response of knee joint pre-and postoperation,observe the therapeutic effect after operation,Lysholm and Larson were used to compare the knee function pre-and postoperation.Results Twenty-nine cases in autograft group were followed up for 5 to 10 years,7 years in average and 32 cases in allograft group for 5 to 6.5 years,6 years in average.The time of generating heat had no significant deviation,biochemistry,immunology after operation had no significant deviation; Lysholm score were 93.28+3.12 (autograft group),93.15±3.22 (allograft group).Difference had not statistically significant (P >0.05); Larson score were 93.12±2.15(autograft group),92.75±3.25(allograft group),difference had not statistically significant; the X-ray and MRI results after operation: autograft group had 5 cases of bone tunnel expansion,allograft group had 6 cases of bone tunnel expansion; postoperative complications: both of two groups had one cases of suppurative arthritis,9 cases in allograft group suffered reject reaction,and need clysis under arthroscope or by paracentesis,but none need take out the graft; 1 patient of allograft group was broken and reconstruction.Conclusion Autograft and allograft B-PT-B transplant have the same clinical curative effect in ACL reconstruction,and can make satisfactory motion and stability of joint,and both are nice grafts.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?