Abstract:Purpose To compare the clinical outcomes of double-bundle (DB) single-tibial tunnel technique and double-tunnel technique for ACL reconstruction in patients with knee hyperextension. Methods Defined as having constitutional hyperextension of greater than 10°, 56 patients with knee hyperextension who underwent ACL reconstruction were included in this study. To exclude concomitant lesions, preoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed in all knees. 24 patients (Group A) were treated with the anatomic DB/single-tibial tunnel ACL reconstruction and 32 patients (Group B) were treated with DB/double-tibial tunnel ACL reconstruction, all the included patients had knee hyperextension. Clinical results were evaluated by the extension angle, ROM, IKDC 2000 subjective score, rotational stability, pivot-shift test and anterior–posterior translation test before the operation and at the end of follow-up. MRI scan of the knee positioned in full extension was performed after 6 months post-operation. Location of tibial tunnels and graft signal intensity were assessed according to the MRI. Results Postoperative extension deficit was detected in Group B, ROM of the injured knee in Group A was from extension angle 8.91 ± 3.16° to flexion angle 115.58 ± 10.53°. ROM of the injured knee in Group B was from extension angle − 2.13 ± 5.88° to flexion angle 119.25 ± 12.63°. Flexion angles of two groups did not show any significant difference ( p = 0.24), while extension angles were quite different ( p < 0.0001). Group A was slightly higher than Group B in IKDC subjective scores, but without significant difference (Group A 45.1 ± 6.5, Group B 42.4 ± 4.8, p = 0.09). There was no significant difference between two groups in pivot-shift test. Post-operational MRI showed more anterior located tibial tunnel and higher graft signal intensity in Group B when compared with Group A. One patient in the Group B had ligament retear, and required revision surgery. Conclusion DB/single-tibial tunnel technique restored the knee stability and overcame the shortcomings (such as knee extension deficit and graft impingement) of DB/double tibial tunnel, which might be more suitable for ACL reconstruction in knees with hyperextension. Level of evidence Level II to III.

Comparison of Arthroscopic Single-tunnel Double-bundle and Single-tunnel Single-bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions

Comparison of clinical outcomes between arthroscopic single-bundle and double-bundle individually anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions

Arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligaments: Single-tunnel double-bundle versus single-tunnel single-bundle

Arthroscopic double-bundle versus single-bundle hamstring tendons for the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament

Clinical Evaluation of Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedure Using Hamstring Tendon Grafts: a Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Study.

[Compare the Clinical Results of Double-Bundle with Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction].

Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligaments with Allograft: Single-Tunnel Single-Bundle Versus Single-Tunnel Double-Bundle Techniques

A Retrospective Study to Compare the Clinical Effects of Individualized Anatomic Single- and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Surgery

Comparison Of Two Methods Of Femoral Tunnel Preparation In Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. A Prospective Randomized Study

[Comparison of Single and Double Bundle Isolate Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Autograft].

The clinical curative effect comparison of single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft versu auto-allograft

[Comparative Study on the Clinic Effects of Arthroscopic Reconstructions of Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament].

Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligaments with Allograft: Single-tunnel Double-bundle Versus Single-tunnel Single-bundle

Comparison of the Methods to Prepare Femoral Tunnel in Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

[Effectiveness Comparison of Double-Bundle and Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Deep-Frozen Allografts].

Y-reconstruction could be better for ACL reconstruction in knee hyperextension versus double-bundle double-tunnel technique: a retrospective comparative study of 56 patients

Comparison Between Single- and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with 6-to 8-Stranded Hamstring Autograft: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

Comparison Between Double- and Single-bundle Arthroscopic Anterior Cructiate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bonepatellar Tendon-bone Allograft

Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Single-Bundle Versus Double-Bundle Technique: Meta-analysis of 19 Randomized Controlled Trials

Clinical outcome of single-bundle versus anatomic double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis]

Single-bundle or Double-Bundle for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Meta-Analysis