Comparative Study of Tunnel Expansion after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Different Fixation in Tibia
Wang Jian,Ao Yingfang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.16038/j.1000-6710.2007.04.011
2007-01-01
Abstract:Objective To investigate the size of and the change in bone tunnel after arthroscopic assisted anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, evaluate the incidence, morphology of the bone tunnel expansion, and analyze the relation of the bone tunnel expansion to the techniques of fixation.Methods From March to December of 2005, 64 cases (65 knees) of arthroscopic ACL reconstruction were performed in our institute and were followed up for an average of 15.8 months (11 to 20 months). According to tibial fixation technique, they were divided into 3 groups: group A with staple; group B with staple and bioabsorbable interference screw; and group C with Intrafix. The diameter and the shape of bone tunnel were measured using X-ray. X-ray of all cases in group C was taken immediately after reconstruction to measure diameter of bone tunnel.Results The incidence of femoral tunnel expansion after ACL reconstruction in groups A, B and C was 97.22%, 92.86% and 93.33%, respectively, in the A-P X-ray view, and 94.44%, 85.71% and 93.33%, respectively, in the lateral X-ray view. The incidence of tibial tunnel expansion after ACL reconstruction in groups A, B and C was 91.67%, 92.86% and 93.33%, respectively, in the A-P X-ray view, and 91.67%, 92.86% and 100%, respectively, in the lateral X-ray view . There was no difference in the incidence of tunnel expansion among the 3 groups. The extent of femoral tunnel expansion in groups A, B and C was 55.71%, 47.60% and 56.40%, respectively in the A-P X-ray view,and 55.52%, 53.00% and 51.30%, respectively in lateral X-ray view. The extent of tibial tunnel expansion in groups A, B and C was 47.14%, 52.60% and 66.20%, respectively in the A-P X-ray view,and 51.85%, 63.50% and 72.50%, respectively in lateral X-ray view. The most common tibial tunnel was in O shape in the A-P X-ray view and V shape in the lateral X-ray view. In group C, 14 tibial tunnels in the lateral X-ray view were in O shape. Tibial tunnel expansion existed immediately in all of the cases after reconstruction in group C. Tibial tunnel expansion was not obvious at the articular outlet in group C. The diameter of the tibial tunnel at the articular line level during follow-up was not different from that immediately after operation in the A-P X-ray view in group C. The diameter of tibial tunnel at the articular line level during follow-up was different from that immediately after operation in the lateral X-ray view in group C, while there was only one case, in which tunnel expansion was over 2 mm.Conclusion There was no difference in the incidence of tibial tunnel expansion among the 3 groups. Post-operative tibial tunnel expansion existed immediately in all cases in group C, which was related to the reaming of bone tunnel. And tunnel expansion was not obvious in the outlet of tibial tunnel in group C.