Abstract:Objective: To explore the clinical efficacy of double beam double tunnel enhanced reconstruction technique in the treatment of knee anterior cruciate ligament(ACL) training injuries. Methods: Twenty-nine cases of ACL injury of knee joint from January 2021 to December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. All the cases were underwent ligament reconstruction surgery. Cases were grouped by surgical technique:there were 14 patients in conventional reconstruction group, including 13 males and 1 female, aged from 22 to 31 years old with an average of (27.07±7.28) years old, autogenous hamstring tendon was used for ligament reconstruction. There were 15 patients in the enhanced reconstruction group, including 13 males and 2 females, aged from 25 to 34 years old with an average of (29.06±4.23) years old, double tunnel ligament reconstruction, the autogenous hamstring muscle was used as the anteromedial bundle, and the posterolateral bundle was replaced by a high-strength line. The difference between knee tibial anterior distance, Lysholm score, International Knee Literature Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Tegner motor level score and visual analog scale (VAS) at 6th and 12th months after the surgery, limb symmetry index (LSI) were recorded at the last follow-up and surgery-related adverse effects during follow-up. Results: All patients were followed up, ranged from 13 to 15 months with an average of (13.7±0.8) months. There were no serious adverse reactions related to surgery during the period. There was no statistical difference between the preoperative general data and the observation index of the two groups (P>0.05). The difference in tibial anterior distance at 6 and 12 months in the enhanced reconstruction group (1.45±0.62) mm and (1.74±0.78) mm which were lower those that in the conventional reconstruction group (2.42±0.60) mm and (2.51±0.63) mm(P<0.05). There was no significant difference in postoperative Lysholm score, Tegner motor level score, IKDC score, VAS, and limb symmetry index at the last follow-up(P>0.05). Conclusion: The enhanced reconstruction technique can more effectively maintain the stability of the knee joint and has no significant effect on the postoperative knee joint function compared with the traditional ligament reconstruction technique. The short-term curative effect is satisfactory, and it is suitable for the group with high sports demand.

[Compare the Clinical Results of Double-Bundle with Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction].

[Comparative Study on the Clinic Effects of Arthroscopic Reconstructions of Single-Bundle and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament].

Clinical Evaluation of Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Procedure Using Hamstring Tendon Grafts: a Prospective, Randomized and Controlled Study.

[Comparison of Single and Double Bundle Isolate Posterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Hamstring Autograft].

Comparison Between Single- and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions for Knee with Grade 2 Medial Collateral Ligament Injury.

Comparison of Arthroscopic Single-tunnel Double-bundle and Single-tunnel Single-bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstructions

[Effectiveness Comparison of Double-Bundle and Single-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Deep-Frozen Allografts].

Comparison Between Double- and Single-bundle Arthroscopic Anterior Cructiate Ligament Reconstruction Using Bonepatellar Tendon-bone Allograft

[Clinical efficacy of double-bundle and double-tunnel enhanced reconstruction in the treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injury]

Comparison Between Single- and Double-Bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with 6-to 8-Stranded Hamstring Autograft: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

Single Bundle vs. Double Bundle ACL Reconstruction: Is there any difference in Joint Stability and Subjectivity?

[Effectiveness Comparison of Anatomical Single-Bundle and Over-the-top Single-Bundle Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament].

Prospective randomized comparison of anatomic single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Y-reconstruction could be better for ACL reconstruction in knee hyperextension versus double-bundle double-tunnel technique: a retrospective comparative study of 56 patients

Single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the medial collateral ligament-deficient knee

Double-bundle Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Technique Has Advantages in Chondroprotection and Knee Laxity Control Compared with Single-Bundle Technique

Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction resulted in better International Knee Documentation Committee objective grading at fifteen year follow-up compared to single-bundle reconstruction

Single bundle vs double bundle for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction evaluated with T2 mapping: A case series

Clinical Research of Simultaneous Bilateral Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

Double bundle ACL reconstruction leads to better restoration of knee laxity and subjective outcomes than single bundle ACL reconstruction

Clinical efficacy of arthroscopic single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament: a retrospective study