Abstract:BACKGROUND: The improvement in production technology of new materials including artificial ligament reduces material rupture caused by fatigue and histocompatibility-related synovitis and other complications, leading to a wide application of artificial ligament. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the histocompatibility and clinical curative effects of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) of the knee with ligament advanced reinforcement system (LARS) artificial ligament using arthroscopy. DESIGN: A completely randomized clinical design. SETTING: Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-two cases of ACL injury received LARS artificial ligament in the Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University From June 2005 to June 2006 and were recruited for this study. The 32 patients averaged 21 years old and were injured in sports. Prior to surgery, MRI showed injury to ACL and semilunar valve in all patients. Written informed consent for therapeutic contents was obtained from each patient. METHODS: Thirty-two patients with injury to ACL of the knee underwent arthroscopic ACL reconstruction. LARS was used to reconstruct the ACL. The LARS was produced by Laboratoire d'Application et de Recherche Scientifique, France (Certification No. CE0459, 1SO9002-EN46002). Artificial ligament was made of polyethylene terephthalate, which had the material type L021201 (left knee) and L021202 (right knee). Artificial ligament was designed to imitate the anatomic structure and biomechanical principle of artificial ligament with specification No. AC120 2BL(left knee) and No. AC120 2BR(right knee). The lot number for artificial ligament in China [import 03460468 (in 2004)]. All reconstructions were performed by a group of physicians who have worked for more than 10 years in the Department of Orthopedics, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and directed by a physician titled with doctor's tutor and chief physician. All included physicians were qualified to perform the surgery. The protocol of treatment was approved by the hospital's Ethics Committee. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Biocompatibility of LARS artificial ligament was observed. Patients were followed up for 24 months on average to score knee function by Lysholm test and subjective satisfaction by Tegner test. RESULTS: All of 32 cases were followed up. The follow-up periods were 18 months (3 cases), 20 months (7 cases), 24 months (8 cases), 28 months (12 cases) and 30 months (2 cases). No complications, such as acute or chronic synovitis, LARS artificial ligament rupture, or limited range of motion were found. The knee joint function was ideal with the range of motion [0° to (128±11.56)°]. The postoperative scores with 85.6 ± 2.24 were significandy higher than the preoperative scores with 45.3±1.31 according to the Lysholm knee joint function evaluation system (P < 0.05). The instability of every knee disappeared with anterior drawer sign negative. Tegner's scores were also increased. CONCLUSION: The biocompatibility of LARS is optimal. LARS artificial ligament reconstruction showed excellent knee joint function and subjective satisfaction degree.

[Anterior crucial ligament reconstruction with allograft hamstring fixed by Rigidfix and Intrafix anchorages]

Arthroscopie Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Using RIGIDfix and Intrafix System with Quadruple-Strand Hamstring Tendons

Rigidfix and Intrafix Fixations of Allogeneic Tendon Grafts in Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Anterior Cru-Ciate Ligament

PROSPECTIVE STUDY ON ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION WITH PRESERVING REMNANT ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT BY ALLOGRAFT LIGAMENT

[Short-Term Effectiveness of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with LARs Artificial Ligament].

RIGIDfixTM tibial and femur cross pin system used for hamstring grafted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Effectiveness of bone-anterior cruciate ligament-bone allograft in reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament under arthroscope]

Reconstruction of anterior and posterior cruciate ligaments with allograft tendon in one stage

Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament using ligament advanced reinforcement system artificial ligament

Reconstruction of Anterior Cruciate Ligament by Transplantation of Autogenous Hamstring and Fixation with a Crossbar (transfix) at the Femoral Side under Arthroscopy

[Initial Therapeutic Evaluation of Arthroscopic Reconstruction of Anterior and Posterior Cruciate Ligament Injury with Anterior Tibialis Tendon Allograft].

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Six Stranded Autologous Periosteum-Enveloping Hamstring Graft under Arthroscope: Clinical Research

Medium-Term (least 5 Years) Comparative Outcomes in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using 4SHG, Allograft, and LARS Ligament.

Double-bundle reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring auto graft under arthroscopy]

[Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Tendon Graft Enveloped by Preserved Remnants].

Arthroscopic reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament using hamstring tendon transplantation in 11 cases

Hamstring tendon autograft versus tendon allograft for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament

The mid-term results of arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using Transfix technique

The Clinical Study of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Anterior Tibial Muscle Tendons Allograft and Hamstring Tendon Autograft

One-stage arthroscopic reconstruction of both cruciate ligaments using Achilles tendon-bone allografts

Arthroscopic Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament Using Multi-Strands of Hamstring Tendons