Abstract:Purpose: To quantify interfractional anatomical variations and their dosimetric impact during the course of fractionated proton therapy (PT) of prostate cancer and to assess the robustness of the current treatment planning techniques.Methods: Simulation and daily in-room CT scans from ten prostate carcinoma patients were analyzed. PT treatment plans (78 Gy in 39 fractions of 2 Gy) were created on the simulation CT, delivering 25 fractions to PTV1 (expanded from prostate and seminal vesicles), followed by 14 boost fractions to PTV2 (expanded from prostate). Plans were subsequently applied to daily CT, with beams aligned to the prostate center in the sagittal plane. For five patients having a sufficiently large daily imaging volume, structure contours were manually drawn, and plans were evaluated for all CT sets. For the other five patients, the plans were evaluated for six selected fractions. The daily CT was matched to the simulation CT through deformable registration. The registration accuracy was validated for each fraction, and the three patients with a large number of accurately registered fractions were used for dose accumulation.Results: In individual fractions, the coverage of the prostate, seminal vesicles, and PTV1 was generally maintained at the corresponding prescription dose. For PTV2, the volume covered by the fractional prescription dose of 2 Gy (i.e., V2) was, on average, reduced by less than 3% compared to the simulation plan. Among the 225 (39 x 5 + 6 x 5) fractions examined, 15 showed a V2 reduction larger than 5%, of which ten were caused by a large variation in rectal gas, and five were due to a prostate shift in the craniocaudal direction. The fractional dose to the anterior rectal wall was found to increase for one patient who had large rectal gas volume in 25 of the 39 fractions, and another who experienced significant prostate volume reduction during the treatment. The fractional bladder dose generally increased with decreasing fullness. In the total accumulated dose for the three patients after excluding a few fractions with inaccurate registration due to a large amount of rectal gas (a condition inconsistent with RTOG protocol), 98.5%, 96.6%, and 98.2% of the PTV2 received the prescription dose of 78 Gy. The V75 and V70 of the anterior rectal wall and bladder both remained within tolerance.Conclusions: The results confirm that the PT planning techniques and dose constraints used at our institution ensure that target coverage to the prescription dose is maintained in the presence of interfractional anatomical variations. Dose coverage in individual fractions can be compromised, and normal tissue dose increased, due to deviations in the bladder and rectal volume compared to the simulation plans or progressive changes in the prostate volume during the treatment. Deviations from the plan can be reduced with efforts aimed at maintaining consistent daily patient anatomy. (C) 2011 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3604152]

Evaluating the set-up errors of tumors at different positions using different image guidance frequency protocol from tomotherapy treatments

Volumetric and Dosimetric Variations in Radiation Treatment Planning Using CT Images Based on Different Reconstructed Field-of-view

Accuracy of UTE-MRI-based patient setup for brain cancer radiation therapy.

910 POSTER MVCT Image-Guidance for Abdominal and Retroperitoneal IMRT Target Volumes

Megavoltage cone-beam CT in the evaluation of set-up errors in head and neck cancers treated with precision radiotherapy

Companison of Dose Distribution and Setup Error of Two Different Positions and Immobilization Techniques in Breast Cancer Radiotherapy

Evaluation Of The Dosimetric Impact Of Interfractional Anatomical Variations On Prostate Proton Therapy Using Daily In-Room Ct Images

Set-up errors in three-dimensional conformal/intensity-modulated radiation therapy measured with repeat CT scans for reducing taget volume

The Preliminary Study of Setup Errors' Impact on Dose Distribution of Image Guide Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer

A Simulated Dosimetric Study of Contribution to Radiotherapy Accuracy by Fractional Image Guidance Protocol of Halcyon System

Setup Errors Analysis and Quality Control in Stereotactic Radiotherapy for Tumors

Analysis of clinical target volume positioning errors using cone beam computed tomography for patients with liver tumors with postoperative simplefied intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Influence of different factors on registration error in a 1.5 T MR-guided linac

Measurement and analysis of setup error in intensity modulated radiation therapy for head-neck tumor

Improvement on target positioning precision in radiation therapy IGRT

SU-GG-J-109: A Study on Image Guided Radiotherapy Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) for Head and Neck Cancer IMRT Patient Setup

Positioning Errors Assessed with Kv Cone-Beam CT for Image-Guided Prostate Radiotherapy

Impact of treatment set-up errors on accuracy of post-operation radiotherapy in patients with breast cancer

Study on effectiveness of radiotherapy line image guidance for dose-error correction in patients with abdominal tumor

Research on the correlation of setup errors for head and neck cancer patients with radiotherapy based on image guiding

Positioning Accuracy And Efficacy Of Different Correction Protocols Based On Kv-Cone Beam Ct Guidance For Abdominal Pelvic Radiation Therapy