Abstract:Background The cone beam CT (CBCT) guided radiation can reduce the systematic and random setup errors as compared to the skin-mark setup. However, the residual and intrafractional (RAIF) errors are still unknown. The purpose of this paper is to investigate the magnitude of RAIF errors and correction action levels needed in cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) guided accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). Methods Ten patients were enrolled in the prospective study of CBCT guided APBI. The postoperative tumor bed was irradiated with 38.5 Gy in 10 fractions over 5 days. Two cone-beam CT data sets were obtained with one before and one after the treatment delivery. The CBCT images were registered online to the planning CT images using the automatic algorithm followed by a fine manual adjustment. An action level of 3 mm, meaning that corrections were performed for translations exceeding 3 mm, was implemented in clinical treatments. Based on the acquired data, different correction action levels were simulated, and random RAIF errors, systematic RAIF errors and related margins before and after the treatments were determined for varying correction action levels. Results A total of 75 pairs of CBCT data sets were analyzed. The systematic and random setup errors based on skin-mark setup prior to treatment delivery were 2.1 mm and 1.8 mm in the lateral (LR), 3.1 mm and 2.3 mm in the superior-inferior (SI), and 2.3 mm and 2.0 mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) directions. With the 3 mm correction action level, the systematic and random RAIF errors were 2.5 mm and 2.3 mm in the LR direction, 2.3 mm and 2.3 mm in the SI direction, and 2.3 mm and 2.2 mm in the AP direction after treatments delivery. Accordingly, the margins for correction action levels of 3 mm, 4 mm, 5 mm, 6 mm and no correction were 7.9 mm, 8.0 mm, 8.0 mm, 7.9 mm and 8.0 mm in the LR direction; 6.4 mm, 7.1 mm, 7.9 mm, 9.2 mm and 10.5 mm in the SI direction; 7.6 mm, 7.9 mm, 9.4 mm, 10.1 mm and 12.7 mm in the AP direction, respectively. Conclusions Residual and intrafractional errors can significantly affect the accuracy of image-guided APBI with nonplanar 3DCRT techniques. If a 10-mm CTV-PTV margin is applied, a correction action level of 5 mm or less is necessary so as to maintain the RAIF errors within 10 mm for more than 95% of fractions. Pre-treatment CBCT guidance is not a guarantee for safe delivery of the treatment despite its known benefits of reducing the initial setup errors. A patient position verification and correction during the treatment may be a method for the safe delivery.

Study on effectiveness of radiotherapy line image guidance for dose-error correction in patients with abdominal tumor

Positioning Accuracy And Efficacy Of Different Correction Protocols Based On Kv-Cone Beam Ct Guidance For Abdominal Pelvic Radiation Therapy

Detection of Intrafractional Tumour Position Error in Radiotherapy Utilizing Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Interfractional and Intrafractional Errors in Radiotherapy of Lung Cancer Using Cone-beam Computed Tomography (CBCT)

The use of IGRT technique to measure the target position errors in SBRT treatment for lung cancer

The Impact of Electronic Portal Imaging Device Position Error on 3D Dose Verification of Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy

Comparison between electronic portal imaging device (EPID) and cone-beam CT (CBCT) in image-guided thoracic tumor radiotherapy

Megavoltage cone-beam CT in the evaluation of set-up errors in head and neck cancers treated with precision radiotherapy

Dosimetric Study on Learning-Based Cone-Beam CT Correction in Adaptive Radiation Therapy.

Determination of Action Limit for Cone-beam Computed Tomography Guided Online Correction of Setup Errors in Radiotherapy for Pulmonary Tumors

Impact of Residual and Intrafractional Errors on Strategy of Correction for Image-Guided Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation

Setup errors with image guided radiotherapy technique

Analysis of clinical target volume positioning errors using cone beam computed tomography for patients with liver tumors with postoperative simplefied intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Setup Error Assessment and Correction in Planar kV Image- Versus Cone Beam CT Image-Guided Radiation Therapy: A Clinical Study of Early Breast Cancer Treated With External Beam Partial Breast Irradiation

Study of Interfractional and Intrafractional Set-up Errors in Radiotherapy Utilizing KV Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Lung Tumors with Online Cone Beam CT Guidance and Active Breathing Control

Accuracy study of different registration methods for cone beam CT and planning CT in image-guided radiation therapy

The Effect of Cone-Beam CT Image-Guidance Strategies on the Delivered Dose for Spine Metastases Radiotherapy.

Evaluation of online/offline image guidance/adaptation approaches for prostate cancer radiation therapy.

Set-up error and dosimetric analysis of HexaPOD evo RT 6D couch combined with cone beam CT image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary malignant tumor of the cervical spine

Weighted Comprehensive Score Evaluation of Cbct Image Guided Positioning Accuracy in Lung Cancer Radiation Treatment