Positioning Accuracy And Efficacy Of Different Correction Protocols Based On Kv-Cone Beam Ct Guidance For Abdominal Pelvic Radiation Therapy

jindong wang,xiao zhong,guoan luo
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.07.1931
2012-01-01
Abstract:To evaluate the setup error and compare different correction strategies in radiation therapy of upper abdomen and pelvic tumors based on kV-CBCT guidance. Fifty-six patients immobilized with thermoplastic body frame received conventional radiation therapy (45-70 Gy/25-35 Gy) of upper abdominal tumor (n = 21) and pelvic tumor (n = 35) with kV-CBCT guided on-treatment verification. CBCT scan was acquired at initial setup, after online correction and post-treatment. Setup errors were measured with automatic registration of bony anatomy between simulation CT and CBCT. The residual margins with online correction and off-line “No action limit (NAL)” correction were retrospectively analyzed. The initial 3 dimensional interfractional systematic error (Σ) ranged 2.2-4.1 mm and random errors (σ) ranged 2.8-5.2 mm for upper abdomen; 2.6-4.0 mm (Σ) and 2.2-5.3mm (σ) for pelvis, with greatest error in superior-inferior (SI) axis. The intrafractional error ranged 0.5-1.4 mm (Σ) and 0.9-4.4 mm (σ) for upper abdomen; 0.4-0.5mm (Σ) and 0.5-0.7mm (σ) for pelvis. The initial setup margins in three directions were within 8.1-13.8 mm for both anatomic sites. After online correction with 2, 3 and 5 mm threshold the margins were reduced to be within 5 mm in three directions. The residual setup margin with NAL correction was 4-5 mm in left-right (LR) and anterior-posterior (AP) directions, and about 9 mm in SI direction for both upper abdomen and pelvis. The interfraction error in SI direction is considerable in SI axis for upper abdomen and pelvis. Online correction with 3mm threshold and an NAL protocol with 7 imagines should be appropriate for effective reduction of setup margins.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?