Abstract:Purpose: To quantify interfractional anatomical variations and their dosimetric impact during the course of fractionated proton therapy (PT) of prostate cancer and to assess the robustness of the current treatment planning techniques.Methods: Simulation and daily in-room CT scans from ten prostate carcinoma patients were analyzed. PT treatment plans (78 Gy in 39 fractions of 2 Gy) were created on the simulation CT, delivering 25 fractions to PTV1 (expanded from prostate and seminal vesicles), followed by 14 boost fractions to PTV2 (expanded from prostate). Plans were subsequently applied to daily CT, with beams aligned to the prostate center in the sagittal plane. For five patients having a sufficiently large daily imaging volume, structure contours were manually drawn, and plans were evaluated for all CT sets. For the other five patients, the plans were evaluated for six selected fractions. The daily CT was matched to the simulation CT through deformable registration. The registration accuracy was validated for each fraction, and the three patients with a large number of accurately registered fractions were used for dose accumulation.Results: In individual fractions, the coverage of the prostate, seminal vesicles, and PTV1 was generally maintained at the corresponding prescription dose. For PTV2, the volume covered by the fractional prescription dose of 2 Gy (i.e., V2) was, on average, reduced by less than 3% compared to the simulation plan. Among the 225 (39 x 5 + 6 x 5) fractions examined, 15 showed a V2 reduction larger than 5%, of which ten were caused by a large variation in rectal gas, and five were due to a prostate shift in the craniocaudal direction. The fractional dose to the anterior rectal wall was found to increase for one patient who had large rectal gas volume in 25 of the 39 fractions, and another who experienced significant prostate volume reduction during the treatment. The fractional bladder dose generally increased with decreasing fullness. In the total accumulated dose for the three patients after excluding a few fractions with inaccurate registration due to a large amount of rectal gas (a condition inconsistent with RTOG protocol), 98.5%, 96.6%, and 98.2% of the PTV2 received the prescription dose of 78 Gy. The V75 and V70 of the anterior rectal wall and bladder both remained within tolerance.Conclusions: The results confirm that the PT planning techniques and dose constraints used at our institution ensure that target coverage to the prescription dose is maintained in the presence of interfractional anatomical variations. Dose coverage in individual fractions can be compromised, and normal tissue dose increased, due to deviations in the bladder and rectal volume compared to the simulation plans or progressive changes in the prostate volume during the treatment. Deviations from the plan can be reduced with efforts aimed at maintaining consistent daily patient anatomy. (C) 2011 American Association of Physicists in Medicine. [DOI: 10.1118/1.3604152]

Positioning Accuracy During VMAT of Gynecologic Malignancies and the Resulting Dosimetric Impact by a 6-Degree-of-freedom Couch in Combination with Daily Kilovoltage Cone Beam Computed Tomography

Setup errors and planning target margin by 6D radiotherapy couch combined with cone-beam CT during volumetric modulated arc therapy in gynecological cancer patients

[Assessments Setup Errors and Target Margin by 6D Couch for Primary Cervical Cancer].

Impact Of Interfractional Motion On Hypofractionated Pencil Beam Scanning Proton Therapy And Vmat Delivery For Prostate Cancer

Analysis of setup errors and planning target margin by cone-beam CT in combination with HexaPOD evo RT 6D couch for postoperative patients of cervical cancer

Positioning Accuracy And Efficacy Of Different Correction Protocols Based On Kv-Cone Beam Ct Guidance For Abdominal Pelvic Radiation Therapy

Evaluation Of The Dosimetric Impact Of Interfractional Anatomical Variations On Prostate Proton Therapy Using Daily In-Room Ct Images

Set-up error and dosimetric analysis of HexaPOD evo RT 6D couch combined with cone beam CT image-guided intensity-modulated radiotherapy for primary malignant tumor of the cervical spine

Positioning Errors Assessed with Kv Cone-Beam CT for Image-Guided Prostate Radiotherapy

Setup Errors Analysis in Iterative Kv CBCT: A Clinical Study of Cervical Cancer Treated with Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy.

Analysis of clinical target volume positioning errors using cone beam computed tomography for patients with liver tumors with postoperative simplefied intensity-modulated radiotherapy

Pelvic target volume inter-fractional motion during radiotherapy for cervical cancer with daily iterative cone beam computed tomography

A Novel Approach for Position Verification and Dose Calculation through Local MVCT Reconstruction

QUANTIFICATION OF 6D INTER-FRACTION TUMOUR LOCALISATION ERRORS IN TONGUE AND PROSTATE CANCER USING DAILY KV-CBCT FOR 1000 IMRT AND VMAT TREATMENT FRACTIONS

Tumor localization using cone-beam CT reduces setup margins in conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for lung tumors

Online Kilovoltage Cone-Beam Ct Guided Lung Cancer Radiation: Initial Clinical Experiences From Shanghai

The impacts of mid-treatment CBCT-guided patient repositioning on target coverage during lung VMAT

Virtual Clinical Trial-Based Study for Clinical Evaluation of Projection-Reduced Low-Dose Cone-Beam CT for Image Guided Radiotherapy

A Noninvasive Method to Reduce Radiotherapy Positioning Error Caused by Respiration for Patients With Abdominal or Pelvic Cancers.

Cone-beam CT Scanning in Study of Setup Margin for Pelvic Carcinoma Irradiation

The positioning accuracy study of the cone-beam computed tomography in combination with the sixdegree couch table