Abstract:Statement of problem: The alignment of the maxillary and mandibular digital scans obtained with an intraoral scanner (IOS) generates digital interocclusal records. Although the accuracy of maxillary and mandibular digital scans obtained from an IOS is widely studied, the accuracy of digital interocclusal records obtained with them is not; even less studied is the accuracy (trueness and precision) of the alignment methods that are available to obtain them. Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to assess the precision under repeatability conditions (repeatability) of the different alignment methods used to obtain digital interocclusal records. Material and methods: Digital scans of maxillary and mandibular casts of a dentate healthy adult were acquired with an IOS. Casts were then mounted in maximum intercuspal position in a semi-adjustable mechanical articulator (1801 AR Model PSH Articulator), and left and right occlusal digital scans were acquired with the IOS. Occlusal digital scans were repeated 7 times under repeatability conditions. After obtaining each pair of occlusal digital scans, the software program of the IOS automatically aligned the maxillary and mandibular digital scans with occlusal digital scans (TRI method), resulting in 7 digital interocclusal records composed of aligned maxillary and mandibular digital scans and occlusal digital scans. All 7 sets of aligned digital scans were exported and realigned in a dental computer-aided design software program by means of global and reference alignment methods (EXO-B and EXO-R methods, respectively). To assess the repeatability, the 7 aligned digital scan sets of each group were repositioned in the common coordinate system by aligning maxillary digital scans, and repeatability was calculated in terms of the distance between the vertices of the mandibular digital scans for each of the possible nonrepeating combinations of pairs (7C2=21). The repeatability was tested by using the Kruskal-Wallis test for nonparametric distribution followed by the Mann-Whitney U test and Bonferroni correction for pairwise comparisons (α=.05). Results: The median with interquartile range for the TRI alignment method was 47 (27) μm for the EXO-B method 41 (25) μm and 16 (5) μm for EXO-R. The Kruskal-Wallis test showed statistical difference between test groups (P<.05). The post hoc Dunn test with Bonferroni adjustment detected significant statistical differences between the EXO-R-TRI (P<.001) and EXO-R-EXO-B (P<.001) alignment methods. Conclusions: This study found that the alignment method could influence the repeatability of digital interocclusal records. The reference best-fit alignment method (EXO-R) provided better repeatability.

Clinical evaluation of a radiographic film holder for standardized alignment of intraoral film

Use of a Simple Intraoral Instrument to Standardize Film Alignment and Improve Image Reproducibility.

Efficacy of a radiographic film holder adapter in generating radiographs of dental implants with improved geometric accuracy and sharpness

Evaluation of the Marginal Adaptation and Gingival Status of Full-Crown Restorations Using an Intraoral Camera

A Technique to Fabricate a Custom CAD-CAM Periapical Radiographic Film Holder for Implant Assessment.

Assessing Efficiency and Image Quality of Dental Radiography Using Modified Dental Holders with Silicone Rubber Integration

An innovative evaluation method for clinical comparative analysis of occlusal contact regions obtained via intraoral scanning and conventional impression procedures: a clinical trial

Accuracy of Intraoral Scanned Digital Model with Metal Brackets

Comparison of Measurements Between Intraoral Scanned Digital Model and Plaster Model

Evaluation of repeatability of different alignment methods to obtain digital interocclusal records: An in vitro study

Repeatability and validity of a modified method of measuring the occlusal force distribution with the T-scan system and digital models

Comparison of the Registration Methods for the Three-Dimensional Facial Scans Applied to the Design of Full-Arch Implant Supported Restoration

Comparison of Different Intraoral Scanners With Prefabricated Aid on Accuracy and Framework Passive Fit of Digital Complete-Arch Implant Impression: An In Vitro Study

[Accuracy and reproducibility of intraoral scanning in vivo]

Accuracy evaluation of 3D-printed dental models used for the fabrication of clear aligners in mild malocclusions

Accuracy of Two Best-Fit Alignment Strategies with Different Reference Areas for Wear Measurement with an Intraoral Scanner: an in Vitro Study.

Consistency and Reliability Analyses of a Comprehensive Index for the Evaluation of Teeth Alignment Performance

Reliability Assessment and Correlation Analysis of Evaluating Orthodontic Treatment Outcome in Chinese Patients

Establishment of reference mandibular plane for anterior alveolar morphology evaluation using cone beam computed tomography

An alternative method for the rapid verification of the three-dimensional adaptation of splinted implant-supported crowns

Clinical evaluation of closed tray impression and intraoral scanning techniques in single posterior tissue-level implant-supported crowns: A self-controlled case study