Abstract:Statement of problem. The accuracy of digital scanning for complete dental arch and implant-supported complete-arch restorations has been reported. However, research addressing the accuracy of digital scanning methods for complete-arch tooth preparation is lacking. Purpose. The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of intraoral scanning, impression scanning, and cast scanning for complete-arch preparation.Material and methods. Maxillary and mandibular jaw typodonts with 28 teeth prepared for complete crowns were used as reference casts and digitized as reference data sets with a desktop scanner. Three digital scanning methods were applied. First, the reference casts were each scanned 10 times with an intraoral scanner to generate the intraoral scanning group data sets. Second, the reference casts were each captured 10 times by using polyvinyl siloxane impression material, and the impressions were scanned with a desktop scanner to generate the impression scanning group data sets. Third, the impressions obtained in the impression scanning group were used to make gypsum casts which were then digitized with a desktop scanner to generate the cast scanning group data sets. Accuracy was determined by trueness and precision. Three-dimensional deviations of the prepared arches and anterior and posterior segments were measured from root mean square values and depicted on color-difference maps. Differences among test groups were analyzed by using a 1-way ANOVA and the post hoc Bonferroni test for normally distributed data or the Kruskal-Wallis test with Bonferroni correction for non-normally distributed data (a=.05).Results. The trueness of the maxillary arch was significantly higher in the impression scanning group than in the cast scanning and intraoral scanning groups (P<.05), but no significant differences were found among the 3 groups of the mandibular arch (P>.05). The precision of both arches was significantly higher in the impression scanning and intraoral scanning groups than in the cast scanning group (P<.05). Color maps showed horizontal symmetrical displacement in the intraoral scanning group relative to the reference data sets and within-group unilateral distal-end distortion. Irregular arch deformations were noted in the impression scanning group, and buccal and occlusal expansion occurred in the anterior-posterior direction in the cast scanning group. Pooled data for anterior teeth indicated that the trueness was lowest in the intraoral scanning group; however, that for the maxillary anterior teeth did not differ, while that for the mandibular anterior teeth differed significantly among groups (P<.05). For the posterior teeth, deviation was the lowest in the impression scanning group, and significant differences were noted in both arches among the 3 groups (P<.05).Conclusions. Of the methods tested, impression scanning was the most accurate for the creation of a digital cast of a complete prepared arch. (J Prosthet Dent 2022;128:1001-8)

Repeatability and validity of a modified method of measuring the occlusal force distribution with the T-scan system and digital models

An innovative evaluation method for clinical comparative analysis of occlusal contact regions obtained via intraoral scanning and conventional impression procedures: a clinical trial

[Influence of Intraoral Scan and Dental Cast Scan on Occlusal Quantitative Analysis of Virtual Dental Model].

[Preliminary Study on Three Digital Analysis Methods for Analyzing the Distribution and Area of Occlusal Contacts].

A Method for Three-Dimensional Analysis of Occlusal Contacts from Digital Dental Casts

In vivo evaluation of the reliability and validity of three digital occlusion analysis methods

Clinical study comparing the accuracy of interocclusal records, digitally obtained by three different devices

Reference values and reliability of occlusal force distribution and occlusal time measured by the T‐Scan system in adults with healthy dentition

[Normal Occlusion Study: Using T-Scan III Occlusal Analysis System].

Accuracy of intercuspal occlusion in 3D reconstruction of three dental cast scanning systems

[The Accuracy of Occlusal Simulation of Virtual Craniofacial Movement Simulation System].

Reliability and validity of two computerised occlusion analysis systems

Comparison of the Accuracy (trueness and Precision) of Virtual Dentofacial Patients Digitized by Three Different Methods Based on 3D Facial and Dental Images

Evaluation of Reliability and Validity of Different Thicknesses of Occlusal Contact Registration Strips Vs Conventionally used Articulating Papers – An Invitro Study

Reliabilty of recording occlusal contacts by using intraoral scanner and articulating paper - A prospective study

Construction of virtual intercuspal occlusion: Considering tooth displacement

[Accuracy and reproducibility of intraoral scanning in vivo]

Accuracy of Three Digital Scanning Methods for Complete-Arch Tooth Preparation: an in Vitro Comparison

Use of T-Scan III in analyzing occlusal changes in molar fixed denture placement

[Accuracy of Intercuspal Occlusion in 3D Reconstruction with the Dental Articulator Position Method].

Comparison of Measurements Between Intraoral Scanned Digital Model and Plaster Model