Abstract:The system of remanding judgment in civil litigation has aroused complaints among scholars,judges,lawyers and the public,which has rendered it necessary to amend the related articles in the Civil Procedure Law.As there is no essential consensus between scholars,judges and lawyers upon this system,it is necessary to develop an "ought to be" interpretation in law.In order to limit the abuse of discretion in remanding judgments in civil cases,Chinese courts have implemented an approach that stresses detailed procedures through local rules and enhances organizational management measures.Compared to the western countries' courts,Chinese courts are unique bureaucratic organizations that adjudication and(judicial) administration are integrated and the presidents have the overall responsibility for organizational performance such as judicial quality and efficiency and resources arrangement.However,such a model of "judicial procedure under the control of organizational management" can not avoid the appellate courts' abuse of discretion by remanding judgments against relevant statutory provisions,regardless of the appealed issues and without judicial reasoning,but instead deprives the litigating parties and the public in general of their participation in the civil procedures,thus damages further the authority of judicial adjudication. Of course,as Chinese judges lack enough professionalization and socialization,it is necessary and reasonable to strengthen and regulate organizational management of judicial adjudication in China nowadays.To adjust the relationship between judicial procedure and court organization,the autonomy of judicial procedure should be guaranteed in the background of organizational management and parties' participation in judicial procedure should be restored.The reasoning for remanding orders,which is bound by the appellants' claims and justified by judges themselves,is the key factor to guarantee the autonomy of adjudication.Therefore,the most important improvement about the remanding system should focus upon the judicial reasoning contained in orders in addition to amending the statutory conditions set forth for remanding.

Review on the Inefficiency and Disorganization of Judicial Power

District Circuit Court: An Approach of Realism——An Analysis Based on Death Penalty Review Process

On the Judicial Efficiency

The Legal Structure and Practical Dilemma of the Establishment of the "Review System"

Reform of the Criminal Procedural System and the Distribution of the Procuratorial Power

The Construction of the Procedural Judicature in China's Criminal Procedure

The Regression of Civil Procedure Law:From the Perspective of Re-reform of Court's Authority to Conduct Investigation and Collect Evidence

On the Procedural Designing of Review Mechanism on Civil Trials

The Present Situation of Abstract Administrative Action Supervision in Our country and the Construction of Judicial Review

The Judicial Reform and Access to Justice——Written after the amending of the civil procedure law

The Build of Three-level Court and the Reform of Retrial Procedure in China

On the Up-building of Criminal Pretrial Review System in China--Expectation under the Revision of the Criminal Procedure Law

On the Rebuliding of the Pretrial Procedure of Chinese Civil Litigation

Reflection on the System of Remanding Judgment in Civil Procedure

System Improvement of Judicial Procedure in the Progress of Social Legal System Construction

Thoughts on Improving the Power to Initiate Judicial Appraisal——In the View of Criminal Proceedings

On the Construction of the Pretrial Procedure with the Nature of Self- sufficiency in the Civil Procedure of China--The Idea of Reform:Coexistence of Pretrial Procedure and Court Trial Procedure

Review and Reflection on the Research of Criminal Procedure

On the Abnormal Functioning of Civil Procedural Law

The Implementation and Reformation of Administrative Litigation Law in China

On the Perfection and Development of the System of Administrative Litigation--the Conception of Revising the Administrative Procedure Law