Can Improvement in Corporate Governance Prevent Large Shareholders from Extracting Private Benefits?
Cao Tingqiu,Wang Qian,Qian Xianhang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2009.01.004
2009-01-01
Abstract:Since the publication of the Berle-Means theorem,the viewpoint of dispersed ownership structure has been prevalent for nearly 50 years.During this period,the study of corporate governance has focused on agency costs caused by conflicts between shareholders and managers under the hypothesis of a dispersed ownership structure.However,since the 1980s,and especially after the excellent study of La Porta et al.(1999),the viewpoint of a concentrated ownership structure has gradually gained popularity and brings austere challenges to the viewpoint of dispersed ownership structure.As a result,the focus of studies of corporate governance has changed to another kind of agency cost,which is caused by the conflict between controlling shareholders and minority shareholders under the hypothesis of concentrated ownership structure.Under the realistic assumption that China is typical country where the ownership structure is highly concentrated,studying the governance of large shareholders and the problems caused by large shareholders seems significant.This paper,using the popular method of ultimate ownership,calculates large shareholders' private benefits of control in Chinese listed companies.On this basis,using data from 1099 listed companies taken from 2004 and 2005,we examine the restricting effect of corporate governance on large shareholders' private benefits of control.We find that,the relationship between corporate governance and large shareholders' private benefit is an inverted U shape,and the overall effect of corporate governance consists of the combined influence of supervisory boards and management governance mechanisms.The other four governance mechanisms considered do not play a significant role in restricting large shareholders' private benefits of control.Furthermore,different firm characteristics also have an influence.Risk and the demand for funds have positive effects on large shareholders' private benefits. By contrast,state ownership restricts the extent of private benefit.