Abstract:Based on data collected from China Law Year Book and practice in one district in east of China from 1997 to 2007,this paper conducts an empirical study on the operation of current Chinese Criminal Procedural Law.Although there are some variations,the data from the district demonstrates all the characteristics demonstrated by China Law Year Book,that is,very low rate of non—prosecution and non— guilty decision,low percentage of defendant appeal and high rate of affirmation of original judgment in second instance trial and trial supervision procedure,which strengthens the conclusion that Chinese criminal process is decided by criminal investigation. A process decided by investigation procedure means once a case is transferred by the investigative organ to be reviewed and prosecuted,it is very likely to be convicted.Most of the first instance trial just reviews and verifies the evidence collected in the investigation procedure.Such process is different from the "trial—center" criminal procedure of western countries.Such process has some advantages,such as encouraging investigative organs to find out the truth of the case by all means and to screen out most of the suspects in the early stage of criminal process to save procedural resources and make suspects get rid of criminal proceedings earlier.However,it does have some disadvantages.It makes investigative organs under great pressures to collect guilty evidence, which would infringe the human rights of the suspects.Moreover,it also makes the public trial a "rubber stamp" to the investigation procedure and cannot revise errors made in investigation. Current judicial reform chooses trail procedure as the breakthrough,and the investigation procedure seems quiet by comparison.This approach of reform is wrong.To be successful in criminal judicial reform,we must start from investigation procedure.The reform of investigation procedure is too ambitious a topic for this paper to look into.But the decision made by the investigative organ at the end of the investigation is the turning point of criminal proceeding.Establishing effective supervision of this turning point is the key to Chinese criminal process.

The Construction of Deferred Prosecution in China

A Comparative Study of the Application of the Doctrine of Prosecuting Discretion in Japan,Germany and China

The Necessity of Introducing the System of Deferred Prosecution to China

The Pretrial Agreement System of American Corporate Crime in the Perspective of Constitutionalism:Reviewing the Stein Case

Corporate Compliance Non-prosecution Reform in China: Who Should be the Target of Application?

Comparison of the Principles of Prosecution and Prosecution Suspension between Germany and Japan

Comparison Between Japanese and Chinese Principles of Criminal Prosecution

Discussion on the construction path of the compliance non-prosecution system

Research on the Influencing Factors of Discretionary Non-prosecution

Prosecution Deferred, Prosecution Exempt: On the Interests of (In)Justice in the Non-Trial Resolution of Transnational Corporate Bribery

Studies on Public Security Penalties: a Comparison Between Germany, Taiwan and Mainland China

On Indictment-only Doctrine in Criminal Procedure of Japan

The Gap Between Law And Practice: An Empirical Study On China'S High Pretrial Detention Rate

On the Principle of Objective and Considerate Obligation

Discussion on the Application and Improvement of Criminal Trial by Default in China

Views on Conducting Civil Proceedings by Procuratorial Institutions

An Empirical Study on Operation of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

The International Criminal Juridical Practice and the Relevant Chinese Policy

On The Construction of Doctrinal Discourse System of Criminal Law with Chinese Characteristics

Criminal Compromise:A New Penalty Reform Notion

On the System of Criminal Trial by Default——Case Study of Joint Crime in Dongguan