Abstract:Based on data collected from China Law Year Book and practice in one district in east of China from 1997 to 2007,this paper conducts an empirical study on the operation of current Chinese Criminal Procedural Law.Although there are some variations,the data from the district demonstrates all the characteristics demonstrated by China Law Year Book,that is,very low rate of non—prosecution and non— guilty decision,low percentage of defendant appeal and high rate of affirmation of original judgment in second instance trial and trial supervision procedure,which strengthens the conclusion that Chinese criminal process is decided by criminal investigation. A process decided by investigation procedure means once a case is transferred by the investigative organ to be reviewed and prosecuted,it is very likely to be convicted.Most of the first instance trial just reviews and verifies the evidence collected in the investigation procedure.Such process is different from the "trial—center" criminal procedure of western countries.Such process has some advantages,such as encouraging investigative organs to find out the truth of the case by all means and to screen out most of the suspects in the early stage of criminal process to save procedural resources and make suspects get rid of criminal proceedings earlier.However,it does have some disadvantages.It makes investigative organs under great pressures to collect guilty evidence, which would infringe the human rights of the suspects.Moreover,it also makes the public trial a "rubber stamp" to the investigation procedure and cannot revise errors made in investigation. Current judicial reform chooses trail procedure as the breakthrough,and the investigation procedure seems quiet by comparison.This approach of reform is wrong.To be successful in criminal judicial reform,we must start from investigation procedure.The reform of investigation procedure is too ambitious a topic for this paper to look into.But the decision made by the investigative organ at the end of the investigation is the turning point of criminal proceeding.Establishing effective supervision of this turning point is the key to Chinese criminal process.

The Necessity of Introducing the System of Deferred Prosecution to China

A Comparative Study of the Application of the Doctrine of Prosecuting Discretion in Japan,Germany and China

Public Cases, Authentication Opinions, and Amendments to Law of Criminal Procedure

Unveiling Human Rights Protection in China from the Perspective of Criminal Procedure Law

A Tentative Exploration into the Feasibility of Administration of Justice's Interference with Domestic Violence

Discussion on the Application and Improvement of Criminal Trial by Default in China

Corporate Compliance Non-prosecution Reform in China: Who Should be the Target of Application?

Research on the Influencing Factors of Discretionary Non-prosecution

On the Application and Perfection of the Presumption of Innocence Principle in China

Discussion on the construction path of the compliance non-prosecution system

On the System of Criminal Trial by Default——Case Study of Joint Crime in Dongguan

On Indictment-only Doctrine in Criminal Procedure of Japan

Comparison Between Japanese and Chinese Principles of Criminal Prosecution

Discussion on the System of Sentencing Proposal

On the practice of sealing up for safekeeping crime records of juvenile delinquency in China: Serviceability and trend

The Appointed Defense System in the New Criminal Procedure Law

Research on the System of Suspension of Prosecution of Juvenile Delinquency

An Empirical Study on Operation of Chinese Criminal Procedure Law

On Procedural Defense

Abolishing the System of Labor Education-rehabilitation and Make the Joining Mechanism Between the Investigation and Trial for Minor Criminal Cases Dovetail

A Research of the Dynamic Mechanism of Criminal Procuratorial Organs to Protect Our Laws