Abstract:Objective To compare faster rehabilitation of different surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty (THA)patients using a direct anterior approach or posterolateral approach.Methods Sixty-eight patients (35 in direct anterior THA and 33 in posterolateral THA) from September 2015 to March 2016 were recruited in the present study.The incision length,operation duration,intraoperative blood loss,serum creatinekinase (CK),C-reactive protein (CRP),erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR),interleukin-6 (IL-6) and visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score were compared between two groups respectively.The Harris hip score,the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) pain,walking,and activity scores,postoperative hospital length of stays,gait analysis,component placement and complications were also compared.Results The mean incision length,operation duration,intraoperative blood loss were 11.23±0.97 cm,73.77±9.20 min and 157.15±35.83 ml in the DAA group respectively,while those in PLA group were 15.16±1.12 cm,64.12±13.31 min and 126.97±45.45 ml.The mean incision length of the DAA group were significantly less than that of the PLA group.The DAA group underwent longer operation time that associated with more intraoperative blood loss.The levels of CK and inflammation markers were increased in the PLA group compared with those in the DAA group.The VAS pain score was less in the DAA group than the PLA group within postoperative 72 hours.Functional recovery in the DAA group was faster than that in the PLA group based on the Harris hip score,UCLA scores,and gait analysis up to 3 months.There was no difference in these outcomes between the groups beyond 6 months.The average postoperative hospital length of stay was 2.95±0.24 days and 3.35±0.51 days for the DAA group and PLA group respectively.The patients in DAA group required less postoperative hospital length of stays.The angle of acetabular cup anteversion in the DAA group (16.4°±2.3°) was lesser than that in the PLA group (20.4°±2.8°).There was one intraoperative nondisplaced greater trochanter fracture in the DAA group,whereas no intraoperative complications were occurred in the PLA group.Conclusion The present study showed that using direct anterior approach in THA provided significant benefits for patients in terms of muscle damage,VAS score,hospital length of stays and functional recovery in the early stage postoperatively compared to using posterolateral approach.

Comparison of the surgical effect between anterolateral and posterolateral approaches through mini-incision primary total hip arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty:a comparison between mini-incision approach and conventional incision approach

Anterolateral Minimally-Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Clinical Comparative Study of 110 Cases

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Mini-Incision Technique for Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Sub-Group Meta-Analysis.

Posterolateral minimally invasion versus standard posterolateral approach in total hip replacement

Preliminary assessment of total hip arthroplasty using lateral mini-incision

Comparison of early clinical outcome between direct anterior approach and mini-invasive posterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty

Comparison of direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: short-term clinical efficacy

Clinical Effect of Modified Lateral Mini-Incision Total Hip Replacement

Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients performed with a minimally invasive direct lateral approach versus the standard lateral approach

Is Two‐incision Approach Superior to the Mini‐posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty?: a Meta‐analysis

Clinical Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Meta Analysis

[Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty with Anterior Incision].

[Comparison of the Effect of Total Hip Arthroplasty Through Mini Invasive Direct Anterior Approach During Learning Curve Period and Posterolateral Approach for the Treatment of Femoral Head Necrosis].

Total Hip Arthroplasty Through a Minimally Invasive Incision

The Analysis of the Outcomes of the Posterior Approach along the Femoral Neck Minimal Incision Total Hip Replacement

Minimal incision for total hip arthroplasty and its effect

Mini-incision Total Hip Replacement for Femoral Neck Fracture in Senile Patients

Comparison of earlier functional recovery in total hip arthroplasty patients using a direct anterior approach or posterolateral approach

Effectiveness of Anterolateral Minimally Invasive and Traditional Posterolateral Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty:a Systematic Review

Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and Meta-analysis