Supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPath) versus mini-incision posterolateral total hip arthroplasty for hip osteoarthritis: a prospective randomized controlled trial
Weikun Meng,Liang Gao,Zhong Huang,Haoyang Wang,Duan Wang,Zeyu Luo,Yang Bai,Guanglin Wang,Zongke Zhou
DOI: https://doi.org/10.21037/atm-20-1793a
IF: 3.616
2021-03-01
Annals of Translational Medicine
Abstract:BACKGROUND: Supercapsular percutaneously-assisted total hip (SuperPath) arthroplasty has been proposed to be minimally invasive and tissue sparing, with possible superior postoperative outcomes compared with conventional approaches for total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, previous studies have underlined the shortcomings of conventional THA approaches, including higher dislocation, more blood loss, longer incisions, more tissue damage, and delayed postoperative rehabilitation. In the present study, we compared the short-term outcomes of unilateral THA with those of SuperPath and the mini-incision posterolateral approach (PLA) for hip osteoarthritis (OA).METHODS: Patients with unilateral hip OA were prospectively recruited and underwent either SuperPath (SuperPath group) or mini-incision PLA THA (PLA group). Perioperative status [operative time, incision length, intraoperative blood loss, soft tissue damage, and length of hospital stay (LOS)], and postoperative function outcomes, including range of motion (ROM), pain visual analog scale (VAS), and Harris Hip Score (HHS), were evaluated and compared between the groups at scheduled time points within 12 months postoperatively.RESULTS: Compared with the PLA group, the SuperPath group yielded a significantly shorter incision length (7.83 <i>vs.</i> 12.45 cm, P<0.001), longer operative time (102.72 <i>vs.</i> 66.22 min, P<0.001), more blood loss (1,007.38 <i>vs.</i> 844.55 mL, P=0.005), and more soft tissue damage (creatine kinase: 1,056.05 <i>vs.</i> 821.50 U/L, P=0.006) on postoperative day 3. The SuperPath group also showed deficient acetabular cup positioning (abduction angle: 36.94° <i>vs.</i> 42.66°, P=0.004) and a greater decrease in ROM (flexion: 107.66° <i>vs.</i> 114.44°, P=0.004; 109.83° <i>vs.</i> 116.11°, P=0.002; 111.66° <i>vs.</i> 118.88°, P<0.001) on postoperative days 1, 3, and 14, as well as severe early-term pain symptoms (pain VAS on postoperative day 3: 7.05 <i>vs.</i> 6.55, P=0.041). However, the LOS, C-reactive protein levels, erythrocyte sedimentation rate (within 2 weeks postoperatively), and HHS were comparable between the groups during the 12 months postoperatively.CONCLUSIONS: SuperPath may be a promising, minimally invasive technique for the treatment of OA in the future. Further investigation is necessary to evidence the possible superiority of SuperPath over other conventional mini-incision THA approaches.
oncology,medicine, research & experimental