Comparison study on total hip replacements with “two-incision”minimally-invasive approach and small-incision-posterolateral approach six years after surgery

GUO Chang-an,CHEN Chen,LIU Bang-zhong,CHEN Yun-su,YAN Zuo-qin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3877/cma.j.issn.1674-134X.2013.05.009

2013-01-01

Abstract:Objective To evaluate the mid-term clinical results of "two-incision"minimallyinvasive total hip replacement( MIS-THR) comparing with the small incision posterolateral approach THR retrospectively. Methods Six years after the operation,15 patients of"two-incision"MIS-THR group and17 patients of small incision posterolateral approach THR group were qualified and enrolled. Harris score was evaluated. The muscle strength of hip flexion,extension,abduction,adduction,internal rotation and external rotation were measured by Cybex 2000 machine. Results The average Harris score of "twoincision"MIS-THR group was( 91. 2 ± 4. 3)( n = 15),and that of the small incision posterolateral approach THR group was( 93. 5 ± 4. 8)( n = 15),( P > 0. 05). There was no statistic difference in Harris score between the two groups( P > 0. 05). The average muscle strength of hip extension,abduction,addtuction,internal rotation and external rotation in "two incision"group( n = 15) were as follows:( 41. 7 ±8. 2) Nm,( 17. 6 ±5. 2) Nm,( 36. 2 ± 2. 8) Nm,( 12. 9 ± 4. 1) Nm,and( 1. 4 ± 1. 3) Nm respectively; while in the small incision posterolateral approach THR group( n = 17),the data were as follows:( 38. 4 ± 4. 1) Nm,( 18. 4 ± 2. 6) Nm,( 5. 3 ± 3. 4) Nm,( 14. 8 ± 3. 7) Nm,and( 1. 7 ± 0. 5)Nm respectively. There was no statistical difference between the two groups( P > 0. 05). The strength of hip flexion in"two-incision"MIS-THR group( 21. 2 ± 4. 3 Nm) was inferior to that of the small incision posterolateral approach THR group( 33. 3 ± 5. 9 Nm)( P < 0. 05). Conclusion There is no obvious difference in mid-term clinical results between "two-incision " MIS-THR and the small incision posterolateral approach THR.