Abstract:Objective:To analyze the clinical outcomes, feasibility, and reliability of a modified direct anterior approach in lateral decubitus position for total hip arthroplasty (THA).Methods:This retrospective cohort study enrolled 364 patients (181 males and 183 females) aged 46-79 (56±11) years, who were randomly selected for primary unilateral THA between January 2015 and January 2018 in the Department of Orthopedics in Anhui Provincial Hospital, the First Affiliated Hospital of the University of Science and Technology of China. The patients were divided into the modified direct anterior approach in lateral decubitus position group (LDAA group, n=184) and the posterolateral approach group (PLA group, n=180). General information [ gender, age, body mass index(BMI), and visual analog scale (VAS)score) ], blood loss, length of stay, 48-hour discharge rate, transfusion rate, and total complication rate were analyzed. Harris score was used in the clinical outcome evaluation during the 1 month and 1 year follow-up. Radiographic assessment was performed by measuring anteversion, inclination, safe zone of cup, transparent line score, stem position, and lower limb discrepancy on the pelvic X-ray 1 month postoperation. Results:Preoperative comparison of general information (gender, age, BMI, and VAS) exhibited no statistical significance (all P values>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss, transfusion rate, length of stay, and 48-hour discharge rate of the LDAA group were (250±123) mL, 1.09%, (47.5±2.5) h, and 85.87%, respectively; and those of the PLA group were (370±184) mL, 17.78%, (66.5±3.5) h, and 6.11%, respectively. The LDAA group exhibited less blood loss, lower transfusion rate, shorter hospital stay, and higher 48-hour discharge rate compared with the PLA group (all P values<0.05). However, the incidence of total complications between the two groups was not statistically different ( P>0.05). The follow-up period ranged from 11 months to 14 months (average: 12 months). The Harris score of both groups improved at 1 month and 1 year postoperation ( F=6.380 , 9.170, all P values<0.05). The Harris scores between the two groups at different time points were insignificantly different (all P values>0.05). The radiographic assessment of anteversion, inclination, safe zone of cup, transparent line score, stem position, and lower limb discrepancy on the pelvic X-ray 1 month postoperation presented no statistical significance (all P values>0.05). Conclusions:The use of modified LDAA in lateral decubitus position for THA is feasible, reliable, and recover faster.

Comparison of earlier functional recovery in total hip arthroplasty patients using a direct anterior approach or posterolateral approach

Comparison of Early Functional Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Direct Anterior or Posterolateral Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Comparison of Early Rehabilitation Effects of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach

Comparison of direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: short-term clinical efficacy

[Early Functional Recovery of Direct Anterior Approach Versus Anterolateral Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty].

Comparison of early clinical outcome between direct anterior approach and mini-invasive posterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty

Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterolateral Approach In Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis Of Randomized Controlled Studies (Vol 12, 1065, 2020)

A Comparison of Clinical, Radiographic and Surgical Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty Between Direct Anterior and Posterior Approaches: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Comparison Of Direct Anterior And Lateral Approaches In Total Hip Arthroplasty A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis (Prisma)

Efficacy of direct anterior approach versus posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Comparison of DAA and PLA Approaches for Total Hip Replacement in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures

Clinical efficacy of direct anterior approach vs. other surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on RCTs

Conversion of a Fused or Ankylosed Hip to Total Hip Arthroplasty: is the Direct Anterior Approach in the Lateral Decubitus Position an Ideal Solution?

Clinical evaluation of modified direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty

Functional outcome of direct anterior versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty: a propensity-matched Asian study

A systematic review and meta-analysis of direct anterior approach versus posterior approach in total hip arthroplasty

Direct Anterior Approach or Posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Exploring the clinical value of direct anterior approach THA for short-term hip function improvement: A single-center retrospective analysis of short-term outcomes

Short-term outcomes of displaced femoral neck fractures treated with hemiarthropIasty using direct anterior approach

Efficacy of Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Lateral Approach for Total Hip Replacement in Patients with Parkinson's Disease.

Direct Anterior Approach Or Posterior Approach In Total Hip Arthroplasty A Direct Comparative Study Protocol