Abstract:Xiaofei Wang, 1, 2, &ast Jihang Dai, 2, &ast Zhimin Wu, 1, 2 Yuxia Yang, 2 Jian Zhang, 2 Xiangji Meng, 1, 2 Wenkang Liu, 2 Wenyong Fei, 2 Jingcheng Wang 2 1 The Graduate School, Dalian Medical University, Dalian, Liaoning, People's Republic of China; 2 Department of Orthopedics, Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital Affiliated to Yangzhou University, Yangzhou, Jiangsu, People's Republic of China &astThese authors contributed equally to this work Correspondence: Wenyong Fei; Jingcheng Wang, Email ; Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of artificial total hip arthroplasty(THA) for femoral neck fracture between direct anterior approach(DAA) in lateral position and posterior lateral approach(PLA). Methods: Comparison of 200 cases of patients who underwent THA collected between September 2019 and August 2021 was done. Incision length, intraoperative bleeding, operative time, difference in postoperative haemoglobin from preoperative levels, length of hospital stay, postoperative time to get off the floor, visual analogue score (VAS) for pain, preoperative and postoperative Harris scores for the hip, and measurements of the acetabular abduction angle and anterior acetabular tilt angle at 6 months postoperatively were collected, and all the cases were followed up for at least 2 years. Results: Compared with the PLA group, the DAA group had a shorter incision length, less intraoperative blood loss, less postoperative haemoglobin reduction compared with the preoperative period, a shorter hospital stay and an earlier first time to get off the floor after surgery, however, the comparison of operative times was not statistically significant; Patients in the DAA group had a lower VAS in the early postoperative period compared to PLA; Patients in the DAA group had higher hip Harris scores at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively; There was no significant difference in acetabular abduction angle and acetabular anterior tilt angle between the two groups at 6 months postoperatively. Conclusion: Compared to PLA, DAA in THA is minimally invasive, has less pain, less bleeding, earlier time out of bed, shorter hospital stay, better early hip function, faster rehabilitation, and better joint stability. Keywords: direct lateral approach, DAA, femoral neck fractures, total hip arthroplasty, THA, Hip function, postoperative rehabilitation With the aging of the population, the number of patients with hip fractures is gradually increasing, and femoral neck fracture is one of the common fractures of the hip. 1,2 Patients will experience a significant reduction in quality of life after fracture, with high rates of disability and mortality. 3,4 Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common surgical procedure for the treatment of femoral neck fracture in the elderly, and its surgical approaches mainly include posterolateral approach (PLA) and direct anterior approach (DAA). 5,6 PLA is a traditional method that allows adequate exposure of the surgical field, but PLA also has the disadvantages of high intraoperative bleeding and elevated risk of dislocation. 7,8 DAA is a surgical approach that follows the anatomical structure of the human internervous/muscular planes, which is less traumatic and can effectively avoid damage to important blood vessels and nerves. 9,10 At present, there is a lack of follow-up comparisons between DAA and PLA. In this study, the aim of this study is to compare the clinical effect of DAA and PLA on femoral neck fracture. Inclusion criteria: (1) Patients with initial unilateral THA; (2) BMI <30 kg / m2; (3) Able to walk independently before fracture. Exclusion criteria: (1) Hip dysplasia or congenital hip disease; (2) those with preoperative infectious diseases; (3) those who could not tolerate the risks of surgery and anaesthesia and those who could not complete the postoperative rehabilitation successfully; and (4) those with other contraindications to surgery. From September 2019 to August 2021, 200 patients with THA were selected, including 103 cases of DAA and 97 cases of PLA. Male 84 cases, female 116 cases. The general data of the two groups of patients, sex, age, BMI (body mass index) and other statistical comparison, found that the differences between the groups had no statistical significance (P > 0.05, Table 1). All patients undergo surgery within a week of the fracture. Table 1 Demographics and Preoperative Data After the success of general anaesthesia, the patient is placed in the uninjured lateral position, fixed the position, and m -Abstract Truncated-

Short-term outcomes of displaced femoral neck fractures treated with hemiarthropIasty using direct anterior approach

Comparison of earlier functional recovery in total hip arthroplasty patients using a direct anterior approach or posterolateral approach

Comparison of direct anterior approach and posterolateral approach in total hip arthroplasty: short-term clinical efficacy

Minimally Invasive Direct Anterior Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty in the Management of Femoral Neck Fractures in Older Patients

Direct anterior approach for hip arthroplasty in treatment of femoral neck fracture in elderly patients with Parkinson's disease

Short‐term outcomes of displaced femoral neck fractures treated with hemiarthroplasty using direct anterior approach

Comparative Study of Anterolateral Approach Versus Posterior Approach for Total Hip Replacement in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures in Elderly Patients

Comparison of Early Rehabilitation Effects of Total Hip Arthroplasty with Direct Anterior Approach Versus Posterior Approach

Comparison of DAA and PLA Approaches for Total Hip Replacement in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fractures

[Surgical technique and early clinical outcomes of direct anterior approach to total hip arthroplasty]

Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty with Collum Femoris Preserving Stems: a Comparison Between the Direct Anterior Approach and the Posterior Approach

Comparison of early clinical outcome between direct anterior approach and mini-invasive posterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty

Direct Anterior Approach Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures in the Lateral Position

Clinical evaluation of modified direct anterior approach for total hip arthroplasty

Outcomes in Arthroplasty Procedures Performed for Femoral Neck Fractures Does Approach Affect Outcome?

Comparison of Early Functional Recovery After Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a Direct Anterior or Posterolateral Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Hemiarthroplasty Versus Total Hip Arthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures: a Meta-Analysis of the Literature

The Superior Approach in Hemiarthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture: A Comparative Analysis with the Posterior Approach

[Early Functional Recovery of Direct Anterior Approach Versus Anterolateral Approach for Total Hip Arthroplasty].

Clinical efficacy of direct anterior approach vs. other surgical approaches for total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis based on RCTs

[Comparison of the Effect of Total Hip Arthroplasty Through Mini Invasive Direct Anterior Approach During Learning Curve Period and Posterolateral Approach for the Treatment of Femoral Head Necrosis].