Abstract:Objective Nowadays,the minimal incision total hip replacement(THR) has been considered to be one approach of the minimally invasive surgery.There are arguments about it in the orthopedics society.There are few domestic systematic compared studies about the minimal incision and the traditional THR.The objective of this study is to compare the short results between the minimal incision and the tradition THR.Methods 60 patients who need the THR are the objects of this study(30 with lateral minimal incision and 30 with standard incision).The data which were collected are about:age,gender,hip(left/right),weight,height,body mass index,blood loss,blood transfusion,operation time,incision length,complication,prosthesis position,time of use walking aids,the Harris hip score pre and after the operation.All the patients accepted the general anesthesia.Every patient received the same anticoagulant therapy post operation.All of them were encouraged to play an active role in the rehabilitation.The mean follow up time is 13 months(6 months to 24 months).The numeration data were tested with chi square test.The measurement data are tested with t test,P<0.05 means the difference is significant.Results There were no significant difference between the mini-incision group and the standard incision group about the body mass index,Harris hip score and complication incidence(P>0.05).The minimal incision group was found to have a significantly advantages of incision length,operation time,blood loss,length of hospital stay,time of use walking aids(P<0.05).The prosthesis position indicated on the radiotelegram was quite well.There was no dislocation,coxa vara or valga,the mean abduction angle of acetabular cup was 45.5°(43°to 48°);the mean anteversion angle was 17.7°(16°to22°).Conclusion The result of the early follow up of this study confirmed that the minimal incision THR didn′t increase the risk incidence of the complications and the promise positions of the prosthesis compared with the standard THR(P>0.05).The minimal incision THR could reduce the blood loss and the hospital stay of the patients,speed the rehabilitation to achieve function goal without increase the risk of the complications.But the surgeons who want to perform THR with this minimally invasive technique must be familiar with the regional anatomy and have already mastered the standard THR.

Total hip arthroplasty:a comparison between mini-incision approach and conventional incision approach

Comparison of Minimally Invasive Surgery and Mini-Incision Technique for Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Sub-Group Meta-Analysis.

Total Hip Arthroplasty Through a Minimally Invasive Incision

Preliminary assessment of total hip arthroplasty using lateral mini-incision

Comparison of the surgical effect between anterolateral and posterolateral approaches through mini-incision primary total hip arthroplasty

Posterolateral minimally invasion versus standard posterolateral approach in total hip replacement

[Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty with Anterior Incision].

Clinical Efficacy of Minimally Invasive Versus Conventional Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Meta Analysis

Minimally Invasive Two-Incision Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Short-Term Retrospective Report of 27 Cases

Anterolateral Minimally-Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty: a Clinical Comparative Study of 110 Cases

Is Two‐incision Approach Superior to the Mini‐posterior Approach in Total Hip Arthroplasty?: a Meta‐analysis

Clinical efficacy of minimally invasive exposure for total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and Meta-analysis

The Analysis of the Outcomes of the Posterior Approach along the Femoral Neck Minimal Incision Total Hip Replacement

Clinical analysis of minimal incision for total hip arthroplasty in 78 cases

Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasty in elderly patients performed with a minimally invasive direct lateral approach versus the standard lateral approach

Comparison of complications in single-incision minimally invasive THA and conventional THA.

Comparison of early clinical outcome between direct anterior approach and mini-invasive posterior approach for primary total hip arthroplasty

Minimal incision for total hip arthroplasty and its effect

Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty without reserving articular capsule

Two-Incision Minimal Invasive Approach for Total Hip Replacement

Clinical Experience of Minimal Incision for Total Hip Arthroplasty in 68 Cases