Consequence of Regulatory Sanction on an Individual Auditor without on the Audit Firm:Empirical Evidence

Wu Xi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1003-2886.2008.08.004

2008-01-01

Abstract:There are two practices by Chinese stock market regulators when imposing sanctions to liable auditors:one is to punish the audit firm and individual auditors,and the other is to punish individual auditors only.There has been long-standing controversy about whether the latter practice is appropriate,but little evidence has been provided.I argue that,compared to the practice of punishing both the audit firm and the individual auditors,the practice of only punishing individual auditors signals a weaker warning toward the quality control mechanism maintained by the audit firm,and therefore the top management of the audit firm and other individual auditors who are not sanctioned are less likely to be deterred in their misconducts.Empirical findings are consistent with the expectation,thus providing evidence against the regulatory practice of punishing individual auditors but without punishing the audit firm.