Abstract:There are two kinds of theories in inductive reasoning:the Similarity-Coverage Model(SCM,Osherson 1990) and the Feature-Based Induction Model(FBIM,Sloman 1993).They are based on the similarity between the base premise and the target premise.The SCM model of induction driven by two related notions,i.e.similarity and coverage,also assumes that judgments may be partially based on the similarity of the premise category to examples of the lowest level super-ordinate category that spans the premise and conclusion categories. Although parts of researchers think that FBIM relies on the notions of(feature) coverage,the central idea is that the similarity is driven by matching and mismatching features and that an argument is strong to the extent that the premise and conclusion categories share features.A distinctive property of FBIM is that it does not use category information in the sense that it does not consider different levels of categorization.Instead,it assumes that all categories are represented in terms of features and that strength of argument is based on feature overlap. Some researches suggest that a category label is just a specific feature of an item.Some find that category labels can be viewed as an integrator of information.This paper focused on whether upper-level category information affects inductive intension.By creating a story-reading paradigm,we used category labels to control upper-level category information to study the effects of category labels.We further explored the category information activated initiatively or passively. Three experiments were made to investigate the influence of feature similarity,category labels and uncertain category labels on inductive tension respectively.We adopted the One-Way-Within-Subjects design to implement the three experiments. Experiment 1 shows that people tend to choose features of high similarity between the base premise and the target premise in experiments.The result is consistent with the account of SCM and FBIM.Experiment 2 shows that people tend to choose features of category labels rather than features of high similarity.It suggests that a category label is not a specific features of an item.Experiment 3 shows that category information is activated initiatively.Even though replaced by uncertain labels,people still tend to choose features of category labels in the same way as in Experiment 2. The above results demonstrate that category labels tend to play an important role in inductive reasoning.Combining previous researches,we hypothesize that inductive intension relies on two quantities:feature similarity and categorization probability.

The role of category label in adults' inductive reasoning

Feature Similarity and Category Labels in Inductive Reasoning

The Role of Labels in Children’s Inductive Reasoning

Feature Similarity, Category Labels,and Causal Relations in Inductive Reasoning

Category Label Effects on Chinese Children's Inductive Inferences: Modulation by Perceptual Detail and Category Specificity.

Relevance and the Role of Labels in Categorization

Granular Knowledge Representation and Inference Using Labels and Label Expressions

P300 and positive slow waves reveal the plausibility in inductive reasoning.

Electrophysiological Differences Between Specific and General Conclusions During Category-Based Induction

Cognitive and Neural Mechanisms of Category-based Feature Inference

The Neural Mechanism of Inductive Reasoning

FN400 Amplitudes Reveal the Differentiation of Semantic Inferences Within Natural Vs. Artificial Domains

What's in a name? Similar and indentical labels in Chinese children's induction

How Semantic Radicals in Chinese characters Facilitate Hierarchical Category-Based Induction

How Does Typicality of Category Members Affect the Deductive Reasoning? an ERP Study

Relationship between Categorization and Category-based Induction in Early Age

A Study of Concept-based Inductive Inference of Infants and Young Children

The Induction of Unfamiliar Materials with Familiar Category Labels

Reward inference by prefrontal neurons

Evidence of a transition from perceptual to category induction in 3- to 9-year-old children

The Research of People' Induction when Categorization was Uncertain