Reward inference by prefrontal neurons

Masamichi Sakagami,Xiaochuan Pan
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2009.09.1663
IF: 2.904
2009-01-01
Neuroscience Research
Abstract:Previous studies have failed to clarify the event-related potentials (ERPs) that occur in response to categorization and property inferences during category-based induction. The present study examined ERP differences among acceptable-induction conclusions, unrelated-category conclusions, and unrelated-property conclusions to dissociate categorization and property-inference processing during category-based induction. The results showed that: (a) conclusions with categories that were unrelated to the premise evoked greater frontal N2 amplitudes, smaller P3b amplitudes, and greater N400 amplitudes, compared to conclusions with categories that were logically related to the premise; and (b) conclusions with unrelated properties evoked larger late positive components (LPCs) during the 700–800 ms time interval compared to conclusions with related properties. These results suggest that the N2–P3b–N400 effects reflect categorization violations, while the LPCs are related to property violations during category-based induction, therefore, the ERP responses to category-related and property-related processes are dissociated respectively during category-based induction.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?